The prospects of a paraconsistent response to vagueness

摘要: Paraconsistent responses to vagueness are often thought represent a revision of logical theory that is too radical be defensible. The paracomplete logic supervaluationism, SpV, not only taken more conservative but also commonly said 'preserve classical logic'. This chapter argues this wrong on both counts. paraconsistent SbV, or subvaluationism, no less than SpV nor so. In the end logics offer equally compelling theoretical approaches vagueness. Each approach objectionable, with neither providing an adequate account vagueness, criticism arises from feature shared by each independent their paracompleteness paraconsistency per se. For all has been said, approach, and associated recourse truth-value gluts, remains contender in accounting for