A Comparison of Functional Outcome in Patients Sustaining Major Trauma: A Multicentre, Prospective, International Study

摘要: Objectives To compare 6 month and 12 health status functional outcomes between regional major trauma registries in Hong Kong Victoria, Australia. Summary Background Data Multicentres from the Victorian State Trauma Registry (VSTR). Methods Multicentre, prospective cohort study. Major patients aged ≥18 years were included. The main outcome measures Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) risk-adjusted Short-Form (SF-12) at months after injury. Results 261 cases 1955 VSTR Adjusting for age, sex, ISS, comorbid status, injury mechanism GCS group, odds of a better relative to six was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.17), 0.83 0.60, 1.12). gender, GCS, demonstrated comparable mean PCS-12 scores 6-months (adjusted difference: 1.2, 95% −1.2, 3.6) 12-months −0.4, −3.2, 2.4) compared patients. Keeping there no difference MCS-12 0.4, −2.1, 2.8) or 1.8, −0.8, 4.5). Conclusion The unadjusted analyses showed but adjusting key confounders, 6-month 12-month jurisdictions.