摘要: Ian Stoner has recently argued that we ought not to colonize Mars because (1) doing so would flout our pro tanto obligation violate the principle of scientific conservation, and (2) there is no countervailing considerations render violation permissible. While I remain agnostic on (1), my primary goal in this article challenge (2): are As such, failed establish Mars. close with some thoughts what it take show do have an related issues concerning relationship between way discount preferences over time projects long horizons, like space colonization.
philpapers.org
sci-hub.se 参考文章(24)
Robert Mueller, Tracy Gill, Luke Roberson, Wiley Larson, Effective Utilization of Resources and Infrastructure for a Spaceport Network Architecture ,(2012)
Preston Greene, Meghan Sullivan, Against Time Bias Ethics. ,vol. 125, pp. 947- 970 ,(2015) , 10.1086/680910
Philip Kitcher, Science, Truth, and Democracy ,(2001)
Philip Stratton-Lake, Ross, W. D. , b., The Right and the Good ,(1930)
Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons ,(1984)
Christopher P. McKay, Margarita M. Marinova, The physics, biology, and environmental ethics of making mars habitable. Astrobiology. ,vol. 1, pp. 89- 109 ,(2001) , 10.1089/153110701750137477
Nick Bostrom, Astronomical Waste: The Opportunity Cost of Delayed Technological Development Utilitas. ,vol. 15, pp. 308- 314 ,(2003) , 10.1017/S0953820800004076
James SJ Schwartz, None, Our Moral Obligation to Support Space Exploration Environmental Ethics. ,vol. 33, pp. 67- 88 ,(2011) , 10.5840/ENVIROETHICS20113317
Nick Beckstead, How much could refuges help us recover from a global catastrophe Futures. ,vol. 72, pp. 36- 44 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.FUTURES.2014.11.003
Alan M. Jacobs, J. Scott Matthews, Why Do Citizens Discount the Future? Public Opinion and the Timing of Policy Consequences British Journal of Political Science. ,vol. 42, pp. 903- 935 ,(2012) , 10.1017/S0007123412000117