Differences in Pre-licensure Interprofessional Learning: Classroom Versus Practice Settings

作者: Judy E. Anderson , Christine Ateah , Pamela Wener , Wanda Snow , Colleen Metge

DOI: 10.22230/JRIPE.2011V2N1A54

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Background : Health Canada and Cochrane reviews indicate a need for rigorous outcome testing following interprofessional learning, particularly in practice settings. This led to research questioning whether knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, values, skills regarding collaborative patient care improve after learning classroom settings based on the degree of exposure compared control group. Methods Findings Pre-licensure students from seven health-profession programs were assigned three groups: Control (no intervention), Education (classroom-based learning), Full-Participant practice-based learning). They later surveyed assess outcomes. Immersion at an setting had greater impact scores than classroom-based education. Both interventions significantly improved related collaboration. Only immersion perceived importance sharing leadership. Changes education intervention persisted five-month follow-up. Conclusions Interprofessional positively impacted participants' perceptions teamwork. Use longitudinal study with group provided evidence that pre-licensure would increase awareness collaborate. encourage longerterm how various could future practitioners approach care.

参考文章(43)
Wendy Armstrong, Michael Wynne, Building on Values: The Future of Health Care in Canada ,(2005)
R M Luecht, M K Madsen, B J Petterson, M P Taugher, Assessing professional perceptions: design and validation of an Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale. Journal of allied health. ,vol. 19, pp. 181- 191 ,(1990)
David L. Cooperrider, Jacqueline M. Stavros, Diana Kaplin Whitney, Appreciative Inquiry Handbook: For Leaders of Change ,(2003)
Bridget Somekh, Herbert Altrichter, Peter Posch, Teachers investigate their work : an introduction to the methods of action research Routledge. ,(1993)
Isra Levy, Jacqueline McClaran, David M. Kaufman, Arun Chockalingam, Sue Beardall, Millicent Toombs, Achieving cardiovascular health through continuing interprofessional development. Canadian Journal of Public Health-revue Canadienne De Sante Publique. ,vol. 92, pp. 10- 16 ,(2001) , 10.17269/CJPH.92.179
Geoffrey Meads, Andrea Wild, John Ashcroft, Rosalind Scott, Hugh Barr, The Case for Interprofessional Collaboration: In Health and Social Care ,(2005)
Sari Ponzer, Uffe Hylin, Ann Kusoffsky, Monica Lauffs, Kirsti Lonka, Anne-Cathrine Mattiasson, Gun Nordstrom, Interprofessional training in the context of clinical practice: goals and students' perceptions on clinical education wards. Medical Education. ,vol. 38, pp. 727- 736 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1365-2929.2004.01848.X
J. D. Horbar, J. Rogowski, P. E. Plsek, P. Delmore, W. H. Edwards, J. Hocker, A. D. Kantak, P. Lewallen, W. Lewis, E. Lewit, C. J. McCarroll, D. Mujsce, N. R. Payne, P. Shiono, R. F. Soll, K. Leahy, J. H. Carpenter, , Collaborative Quality Improvement for Neonatal Intensive Care Pediatrics. ,vol. 107, pp. 14- 22 ,(2001) , 10.1542/PEDS.107.1.14
Grant Charles, Lesley Bainbridge, John Gilbert, The University of British Columbia model of interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care. ,vol. 24, pp. 9- 18 ,(2010) , 10.3109/13561820903294549