Robotic-Assisted Transperitoneal Aortic Lymphadenectomy as Part of Staging Procedure for Gynaecological Malignancies: Single Institution Experience

作者: V. Zanagnolo , D. Rollo , T. Tomaselli , P. G. Rosenberg , L. Bocciolone

DOI: 10.1155/2013/931318

关键词:

摘要: Introduction. This study was designed to confirm the feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted transperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy as part staging procedure for gynecologic malignancies. Methods. Chart review 51 patients who had undergone robotic with different gynaecologic malignancies performed. Results. The primary diagnosis follows: 6 cases endometrial cancer, 31 epithelial ovarian 9 nonepithelial 4 tubal 1 cervical cancer. Median BMI 23 kg/m2. Except a single case only, both pelvic lymphadenectomies were performed at time procedure. All para-aortic carried out level renal veinl but inferior mesenteric artery. Hysterectomy in 24 patiens (47%). There no conversion LPT. median console 285 (range 195–402) significant difference between underwent hysterectomy those did not. estimated blood loss 50 mL 20–200). mean number removed nodes . , whereas Conclusions. Robotic infrarenal is feasible can be safely Additional trocars are needed when surgery also

参考文章(26)
P M Magtibay, J F Magrina, V Zanagnolo, R M C Kho, B N Noble, D Giles, Robotic surgery for endometrial cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and recurrence with laparoscopy, vaginal/laparoscopy and laparotomy. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. ,vol. 32, pp. 476- 480 ,(2011)
Maxime Fastrez, Jean Vandromme, Pascale George, Serge Rozenberg, Michel Degueldre, Robot assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the management of advanced cervical carcinoma. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. ,vol. 147, pp. 226- 229 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.EJOGRB.2009.09.003
John B. Schlaerth, Nicola M. Spirtos, Linda F. Carson, Guy Boike, Thomas Adamec, Bette Stonebraker, Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy followed by immediate laparotomy in women with cervical cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecologic Oncology. ,vol. 85, pp. 81- 88 ,(2002) , 10.1006/GYNO.2001.6555
Fabio Ghezzi, Antonella Cromi, Stefano Uccella, Valentino Bergamini, Silvia Tomera, Massimo Franchi, Pierfrancesco Bolis, Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the surgical management of apparent early stage ovarian cancer Gynecologic Oncology. ,vol. 105, pp. 409- 413 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.YGYNO.2006.12.025
Marc Possover, Norman Krause, Karin Plaul, Rosemarie Kühne-Heid, Achim Schneider, Laparoscopic Para-aortic and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Experience with 150 Patients and Review of the Literature Gynecologic Oncology. ,vol. 71, pp. 19- 28 ,(1998) , 10.1006/GYNO.1998.5107
John F. Boggess, Paola A. Gehrig, Leigh Cantrell, Aaron Shafer, Mildred Ridgway, Elizabeth N. Skinner, Wesley C. Fowler, A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 199, pp. 360- 362 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.AJOG.2008.08.012
Leigh G. Seamon, Jeffrey M. Fowler, Debra L. Richardson, Matthew J. Carlson, Sue Valmadre, Gary S. Phillips, David E. Cohn, A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. ,vol. 114, pp. 162- 167 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.YGYNO.2009.04.017
Karen Y. Tang, Stuart K. Gardiner, Claire Gould, Blake Osmundsen, Michael Collins, William E. Winter, Robotic surgical staging for obese patients with endometrial cancer. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 206, ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.AJOG.2012.01.002
Maria C. Bell, Jenny Torgerson, Usha Seshadri-Kreaden, Allison Wierda Suttle, Sharon Hunt, Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques Gynecologic Oncology. ,vol. 111, pp. 407- 411 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.YGYNO.2008.08.022