THE STRUCTURE OF CITIZEN PREFERENCES FOR GOVERNMENT SOIL EROSION CONTROL PROGRAMS

作者: Jeffrey L. Jordan , Abdelmoneim H. Elnagheeb

DOI: 10.1017/S0081305200018392

关键词:

摘要: cies, including soil conservation policies, represent The 1990 Farm Bill contains several measures significant costs to consumers and tax-payers, concerning erosion caused by U.S. farmers, is likely be influenced public Data from a nationwide survey of people input in the decision-making process. Therefore, it their attitudes toward agriculture were used exam- isusefultogaugethepublic's willingnesstosupport ine structure respondents' preferences for gov- control programs. This support will ernment support-policies combat erosion. depend, part, on public's awareness perEstimates influence socio-economic ceptions an problem. Previous research demographic variables policy has concentrated farmer's decision adopcomputed using multiple-indicator model. Results tion practices (Earle et al.; Ervin show more regulation erosion, Ervin; Lynne Norris Batie). Empirical laws fines, than government finan- analyses citizen perceptions probcialsupport. lem programs, however, are few. aim this study was

参考文章(25)
Karl G. Jöreskog, Dag Sörbom, Simultaneous Analysis of Longitudinal Data From Several Cohorts Springer, New York, NY. pp. 323- 341 ,(1985) , 10.1007/978-1-4613-8536-3_10
David E. Ervin, Christine A. Ervin, Factors Affecting the Use of Soil Conservation Practices: Hypotheses, Evidence, and Policy Implications Land Economics. ,vol. 58, pp. 277- 292 ,(1982)
Robert T Deacon, Perry Shapiro, Private Preference for Collective Goods Revealed Through Voting on Referenda The American Economic Review. ,vol. 65, pp. 943- 955 ,(1975)
Patricia E. Norris, Sandra S. Batie, VIRGINIA FARMERS' SOIL CONSERVATION DECISIONS: AN APPLICATION OF TOBIT ANALYSIS Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. ,vol. 19, pp. 79- 90 ,(1987) , 10.1017/S0081305200017404
John Miranowski, M. Morehart, E. Nielsen, Investments in Soil Conservation and Land Improvements: Factors Explaining Farmers Decisions Research Papers in Economics. ,(1989)
JamesM. Ferris, Interrelationships among public spending preferences: A micro analysis Public Choice. ,vol. 45, pp. 139- 153 ,(1985) , 10.1007/BF00215061
James M. Ferris, Demands for public spending: An attitudinal approach Public Choice. ,vol. 40, pp. 135- 154 ,(1983) , 10.1007/BF00118516
Bengt Muthén, David Kaplan, A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. ,vol. 38, pp. 171- 189 ,(1985) , 10.1111/J.2044-8317.1985.TB00832.X
Emin Babakus, Carl E. Ferguson, Karl G. Jöreskog, The Sensitivity of Confirmatory Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis to Violations of Measurement Scale and Distributional Assumptions Journal of Marketing Research. ,vol. 24, pp. 222- 228 ,(1987) , 10.1177/002224378702400209
P. M. BENTLER, CHIH-PING CHOU, Practical Issues in Structural Modeling Sociological Methods & Research. ,vol. 16, pp. 78- 117 ,(1987) , 10.1177/0049124187016001004