Judgment aggregation in dynamic logic of propositional assignments

作者: Arianna Novaro , Umberto Grandi , Andreas Herzig

DOI: 10.1093/LOGCOM/EXY024

关键词:

摘要: Judgment aggregation models a group of agents having to collectively decide over number logically interconnected issues starting from their individual opinions. In recent years, growing literature has focused on the design logical systems for social choice theory, and judgment in particular, making use languages designed ad hoc this purpose. paper we deploy existing formalism Dynamic Logic Propositional Assignments (DL-PA), an instance where atomic programs affect propositional valuations. We show that DL-PA is well-suited modeling binary judgments multiple agents, by providing equivalences some best-known procedures, desirable axioms coming properties safety agenda problem.

参考文章(48)
Steven J. Brams, Peter C. Fishburn, Chapter 4 Voting procedures Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare. ,vol. 1, pp. 173- 236 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S1574-0110(02)80008-X
Pierre Marquis, Consequence Finding Algorithms Handbook for Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertain Management Systems. ,vol. 5, pp. 41- 145 ,(2000) , 10.1007/978-94-017-1737-3_3
Andreas Herzig, Pilar Pozos-Parra, François Schwarzentruber, Belief Merging in Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments foundations of information and knowledge systems. pp. 381- 398 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-3-319-04939-7_19
Laurent Perrussel, Andreas Herzig, Sylvie Doutre, A dynamic logic framework for abstract argumentation principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. pp. 62- 71 ,(2014)
Andreas Herzig, Belief change operations: a short history of nearly everything, told in dynamic logic of propositional assignments principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. pp. 141- 150 ,(2014)
Umberto Grandi, Ulle Endriss, Binary aggregation by selection of the most representative voter national conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 668- 674 ,(2014)
Benoit Gaudou, Andreas Herzig, Emiliano Lorini, Christophe Sibertin-Blanc, How to Do Social Simulation in Logic: Modelling the Segregation Game in a Dynamic Logic of Assignments Multi-Agent-Based Simulation XII. pp. 59- 73 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-3-642-28400-7_5
Christian List, The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review Synthese. ,vol. 187, pp. 179- 207 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S11229-011-0025-3
Lawrence G. Sager, Lewis A. Kornhauser, The One and the Many: Adjudication in Collegial Courts California Law Review. ,vol. 81, pp. 1- 59 ,(1993) , 10.15779/Z38C43K
Tobias Nipkow, Social Choice Theory in HOL Journal of Automated Reasoning. ,vol. 43, pp. 289- 304 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S10817-009-9147-4