作者: Jesús Ramírez-Rodrigo , José Antonio Moreno-Vázquez , Alberto Ruiz-Villaverde , María Ángeles Sánchez-Caravaca , Martín Lopez de la Torre-Casares
DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2753.2012.01819.X
关键词:
摘要: Background Currently, we have different scales to estimate the cardiovascular risk of one individual. The most commonly used in clinical practice are Framingham method and SCORE project. Both based on mathematical models that take into account presence intensity various factors for morbidity mortality. Aims objectives aim our study was develop a measurement system allows unifying criteria both models. Thus, will be able globally cohort patients instead individually. Methods included representative subgroup 50 treated at Endocrinology Service Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, below 30 years or above 75 years. equations present were strict compliance with original publications. reliability validity results tested, comparing them obtained using calculation programs developed, available on-line. degree similarity determined by means Dice index distance between values those other compared expression: Da–b = √Σ(a − b)2 Results demonstrated application reliable valid assessment. Our observations also differences applied create tools. This may repercussions decisions some patients, suggesting need compare standardize these criteria, ensuring developed this correctly manage categories considered. Conclusion validates computer tool simultaneous disease probability applying Framingham-Anderson Framingham-Wilson methods, Spanish adaptations Regicor Dorica,