THE DUAL NATURE OF HYDROPEAKING RIVERS: IS ECOPEAKING POSSIBLE?

作者: N. E. Jones

DOI: 10.1002/RRA.2653

关键词:

摘要: Philosophically, the natural flow regime concept is tremendously appealing; however, its application can be challenging for many biologists without expertise or resources to handle such approaches on their own. This particularly true hydropeaking rivers, where incorporating sometimes challenging. Additional challenges include our limited understanding of how individual components relate geomorphic and ecological processes. Supplementary environmental that rivers are ecologically two different in one: low high peaking flow. Taxa require a narrow range water velocities cannot withstand rapid changes discharge would likely eliminated competitively disadvantaged under harsh conditions. As peak flows diverge, become increasingly ecologically, there will fewer taxa abiotic variability. Deviations from may result new constraints certain fishes invertebrates, but this does not necessarily mean loss productive fish habitat. Viewing as one risks associated with ratios serve more practical useful perspective towards maintaining altered yet while representing step improving management river ecosystems. © Her Majesty Queen Right Canada 2013.

参考文章(37)
MICHAEL J. BRADFORD, PAUL S. HIGGINS, JOSH KORMAN, JEFF SNEEP, Test of an environmental flow release in a British Columbia river: does more water mean more fish? Freshwater Biology. ,vol. 56, pp. 2119- 2134 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1365-2427.2011.02633.X
C. Konrad, B. D. Richter, M. M. Davis, C. Apse, A PRESUMPTIVE STANDARD FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW PROTECTION River Research and Applications. ,vol. 28, pp. 1312- 1321 ,(2012) , 10.1002/RRA.1511
N. E. Jones, SPATIAL PATTERNS OF BENTHIC INVERTEBRATES IN REGULATED AND NATURAL RIVERS River Research and Applications. ,vol. 29, pp. 343- 351 ,(2013) , 10.1002/RRA.1601
John C. Schmidt, Robert H. Webb, Richard A. Valdez, G. Richard Marzolf, Lawrence E. Stevens, Science and Values in River Restoration in the Grand Canyon There is no restoration or rehabilitation strategy that will improve the status of every riverine resource BioScience. ,vol. 48, pp. 735- 747 ,(1998) , 10.2307/1313336
D. A. Scruton, C. J. Pennell, M. J. Robertson, L. M. N. Ollerhead, K. D. Clarke, K. Alfredsen, A. Harby, R. S. McKinley, Seasonal Response of Juvenile Atlantic Salmon to Experimental Hydropeaking Power Generation in Newfoundland, Canada North American Journal of Fisheries Management. ,vol. 25, pp. 964- 974 ,(2005) , 10.1577/M04-133.1
Howard M. Trotzky, Richard W. Gregory, The Effects of Water Flow Manipulation Below a Hydroelectric Power Dam on the Bottom Fauna of the Upper Kennebec River, Maine Transactions of The American Fisheries Society. ,vol. 103, pp. 318- 324 ,(1974) , 10.1577/1548-8659(1974)103<318:TEOWFM>2.0.CO;2
Vincent H. Resh, Arthur V. Brown, Alan P. Covich, Martin E. Gurtz, Hiram W. Li, G. Wayne Minshall, Seth R. Reice, Andrew L. Sheldon, J. Bruce Wallace, Robert C. Wissmar, The Role of Disturbance in Stream Ecology Journal of the North American Benthological Society. ,vol. 7, pp. 433- 455 ,(1988) , 10.2307/1467300
STUART E. BUNN, ANGELA H. ARTHINGTON, Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management. ,vol. 30, pp. 492- 507 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S00267-002-2737-0