The Development and Use of Evidence Summaries for Point of Care Information Systems: A Streamlined Rapid Review Approach.

作者: Zachary Munn , Craig Lockwood , Sandeep Moola

DOI: 10.1111/WVN.12094

关键词:

摘要: Background A systematic review of evidence is the research method which underpins traditional approach to evidence-based health care. As reviews follow a rigorous methodology, they can take substantial amount time complete ranging in duration from 6 months 2 years. Rapid have been proposed as provide summaries literature more timely fashion. Aim The aim this paper outline our experience developing context point care resource contribution emerging field rapid methodologies. Methods Evidence are defined synopsis that summarizes existing international on healthcare interventions or activities. These based structured searches and selected databases. Following search, all studies assessed for internal validity using an abridged set critical appraisal tools. Once developed, undergo three levels peer by external experts. Results As November 2014, there 2458 created across range conditions inform practices. In addition, ongoing development various new wide topics. Approximately 60–70 published every month, covering medical specialty areas. All updated annually. Linking Evidence Action Systematic reviews, although ideal type practice, often do not meet needs users at This article describes framework creation summaries, review. Although may result less process development, be useful improving practice

参考文章(26)
Lynda Facchiano, Charlene Hoffman Snyder, Evidence-based practice for the busy nurse practitioner: Part two: Searching for the best evidence to clinical inquiries Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. ,vol. 24, pp. 640- 648 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1745-7599.2012.00749.X
Gabrielle Goldet, Jeremy Howick, Understanding GRADE: an introduction Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. ,vol. 6, pp. 50- 54 ,(2013) , 10.1111/JEBM.12018
N. Ann Scott, Carmen Moga, Pamela Barton, Saifudin Rashiq, Donald Schopflocher, Paul Taenzer, Christa Harstall, , Creating clinically relevant knowledge from systematic reviews: the challenges of knowledge translation Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. ,vol. 13, pp. 681- 688 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1365-2753.2007.00830.X
Amber Watt, Alun Cameron, Lana Sturm, Timothy Lathlean, Wendy Babidge, Stephen Blamey, Karen Facey, David Hailey, Inger Norderhaug, Guy Maddern, RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE? Anz Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 78, pp. 1037- 1040 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1445-2197.2008.04730.X
David Moher, Lesley Stewart, Paul Shekelle, Establishing a new journal for systematic review products Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 1, pp. 1- 3 ,(2012) , 10.1186/2046-4053-1-1
Zachary Munn, Sheila Kavanagh, Craig Lockwood, Alan Pearson, Fiona Wood, The development of an evidence based resource for burns care. Burns. ,vol. 39, pp. 577- 582 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.BURNS.2012.11.005
David L. Schriger, One is the loneliest number: Be skeptical of evidence summaries based on limited literature reviews Annals of Emergency Medicine. ,vol. 36, pp. 517- 519 ,(2000) , 10.1067/MEM.2000.110997