作者: Zachary Munn , Craig Lockwood , Sandeep Moola
DOI: 10.1111/WVN.12094
关键词:
摘要: Background A systematic review of evidence is the research method which underpins traditional approach to evidence-based health care. As reviews follow a rigorous methodology, they can take substantial amount time complete ranging in duration from 6 months 2 years. Rapid have been proposed as provide summaries literature more timely fashion. Aim The aim this paper outline our experience developing context point care resource contribution emerging field rapid methodologies. Methods Evidence are defined synopsis that summarizes existing international on healthcare interventions or activities. These based structured searches and selected databases. Following search, all studies assessed for internal validity using an abridged set critical appraisal tools. Once developed, undergo three levels peer by external experts. Results As November 2014, there 2458 created across range conditions inform practices. In addition, ongoing development various new wide topics. Approximately 60–70 published every month, covering medical specialty areas. All updated annually. Linking Evidence Action Systematic reviews, although ideal type practice, often do not meet needs users at This article describes framework creation summaries, review. Although may result less process development, be useful improving practice