The comparative effect of individually-generated vs. collaboratively-generated computer-based concept mapping on science concept learning

作者: Lauren Cifuentes , So Young Kwon

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Using a quasi-experimental design, the researcher investigated comparative effects of individually-generated and collaboratively-generated computer-based concept mapping on middle school science learning. Qualitative data were analyzed to explain quantitative findings. One hundred sixty-one students (74 boys 87 girls) in eight, seventh grade classes at Southeast Texas completed entire study. prior performance scores assure equivalence student achievement across groups, assigned teacher’s one three experimental groups. The independent variable, group, consisted levels: 40 control 59 trained individually generate maps computers, 62 collaboratively computers. dependent variables learning as demonstrated by comprehension test scores, quality created groups rubric scores. Students received training used their newly acquired skills or construct during study time. group had equivalent experiences for 50 minutes five days, excepting that worked independently without activities, individual maps, collaborative Both generated positive effect but neither strategy was more effective than other. However, who significantly higher those maps. concluded software, Inspiration™, fostered construction students’ helped capture evolving creative ideas organize them meaningful Students both attitudes toward using Inspiration™ software.

参考文章(100)
Lynne Anderson-Inman, Mark Horney, Computer-Based Concept Mapping: Enhancing Literacy with Tools for Visual Thinking (Technology Tidbits) Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. ,vol. 40, ,(1997)
Edward L. Meyen, Strategies for Teaching Exceptional Children in Inclusive Settings. Love Publishing Company, 4925 East Pacific Place, Denver, CO 80222 ($39.95).. ,(1996)
John H. Flavell, Metacognitive aspects of problem solving The nature of intelligence. pp. 231- 235 ,(1976)
Eric Plotnick, Concept Mapping: A Graphical System for Understanding the Relationship between Concepts. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology, Syracuse University, 4-194 Center for Science and Technology, Syracuse, NY 13244-4100 (free while supplies last).. ,(1997)
Anne Nielsen Hibbing, Joan L. Rankin-Erickson, A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words: Using Visual Images To Improve Comprehension for Middle School Struggling Readers. The Reading Teacher. ,vol. 56, ,(2003)
David W. Johnson, Roger T. Johnson, Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Fourth Edition. Allyn and Bacon, 160 Gould Street, Needham Heights, MA 02194.. ,(1994)
Heinz Mandl, Johannes Bruhn, Frank Fisher, Cornelia Graesel, Mapping-Enhanced Collaborative Knowledge Construction. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. ,vol. 1999, ,(1999)
Paula J. Snyder, Anne R. Peterson, Using Mind Maps To Teach Social Problems Analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Social Problems (48th, San Francisco, CA, August 20-22, 1998).. ,(1998)