Go in Peace: Brain Death, Reasonable Accommodation and Jewish Mourning Rituals.

作者: Ezra Gabbay , Joseph J. Fins

DOI: 10.1007/S10943-019-00874-Y

关键词:

摘要: Religious objections to brain death are common among Orthodox Jews. These often lead conflicts between families of patients who diagnosed with death, and physicians hospitals. Israel, New York Jersey (among other jurisdictions) include accommodation clauses in their regulations or laws regarding the determination by brain-death criteria. The purpose these is allow an opportunity oppose even veto (in case Israel Jersey) determinations death. In York, extent duration this period generally left discretion individual institutions. Jewish tradition has embraced cultural psychological mechanisms help cope loss through a structured process that includes quick separation from physical body dead gradual transition phases mourning (Aninut,Kriah, timely burial, Shiva, Shloshim, first year mourning). This meant achieve closure, acceptance, support for bereaved, commemoration, faith afterlife affirmation life survivors. We argue open-ended contention under reasonable may undermine deep wisdom informs tradition. By promoting dispute conflict, inevitable acceptance delayed comforting rituals deferred at expense bereft family. Solutions problem separating discussions organ donation those concerning diagnosis per se, allowing no escalation life-sustaining interventions rather than unilateral withdrawal mechanical ventilation, engagement rabbinical leaders cases policy formulations prioritize emotional families.

参考文章(19)
Robert S. Olick, Eli A. Braun, Joel Potash, Accommodating religious and moral objections to neurological death. Journal of Clinical Ethics. ,vol. 20, pp. 183- ,(2009)
J. Cohen, T. Ashkenazi, E. Katvan, P. Singer, Brain death determination in Israel: the first two years experience following changes to the brain death law-opportunities and challenges. American Journal of Transplantation. ,vol. 12, pp. 2514- 2518 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1600-6143.2012.04089.X
JOSEPH J. FINS, Approximation and Negotiation: Clinical Pragmatism and Difference Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. ,vol. 7, pp. 68- 76 ,(1998) , 10.1017/S0963180198701070
S. Al-Shammri, R.F. Nelson, R. Madavan, T.A. Subramaniam, T.R. Swaminathan, Survival of Cardiac Function after Brain Death in Patients in Kuwait European Neurology. ,vol. 49, pp. 90- 93 ,(2003) , 10.1159/000068506
T P Hung, S T Chen, Prognosis of deeply comatose patients on ventilators. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. ,vol. 58, pp. 75- 80 ,(1995) , 10.1136/JNNP.58.1.75
Joseph J. Fins, Across the divide: religious objections to brain death. Journal of Religion & Health. ,vol. 34, pp. 33- 40 ,(1995) , 10.1007/BF02248636
Masahiro Morioka, Reconsidering Brain Death: A Lesson from Japan's Fifteen Years of Experience Hastings Center Report. ,vol. 31, pp. 41- 46 ,(2001) , 10.2307/3527955
Audrey S. Penn, Nelson G. Richards, Marjorie Seybold, Philip T. White, Patrick Bray, Maynard M. Cohen, W. Harrison, Robert G. Feldman, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY ,(1981)