A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments

作者: Anthony Hunter

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJAR.2012.08.003

关键词:

摘要: Argumentation can be modelled at an abstract level using a directed graph where each node denotes argument and arc attack by one on another. Since arguments are often uncertain, it useful to quantify the uncertainty associated with argument. Recently, there have been proposals extend argumentation take this into account. This assigns probability value for that represents degree which is believed hold, then used generate distribution over full subgraphs of graph, in turn determine set admissible or extension. In order more fully understand argumentation, paper, we idea considering logic-based uncertain arguments. based models language, give constructed classical logic. We show how formalization logical relates arguments, consider number interesting classes assignments.

参考文章(53)
Claudette Cayrol, On the relation between argumentation and non-monotonic coherence based entailment international joint conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 1443- 1448 ,(1995)
Leila Amgoud, Martin Caminada, An axiomatic account of formal argumentation national conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 608- 613 ,(2005)
Phan Minh Thang, Phan Minh Dung, Towards (Probabilistic) Argumentation for Jury-based Dispute Resolution computational models of argument. pp. 171- 182 ,(2010)
Glauber De Bona, Marcelo Finger, Probabilistic satisfiability: logic-based algorithms and phase transition international joint conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 528- 533 ,(2011) , 10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-096
Leila Amgoud, Henri Prade, Reaching agreement through argumentation: a possibilistic approach principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. pp. 175- 182 ,(2004)
Ernest Wilcox Adams, A primer of probability logic ,(1996)
Paul-Amaury Matt, Francesca Toni, Juan R. Vaccari, Dominant decisions by argumentation agents ArgMAS'09 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. pp. 42- 59 ,(2009) , 10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_3
Leila Amgoud, Philippe Besnard, Bridging the Gap between Abstract Argumentation Systems and Logic scalable uncertainty management. ,vol. 5785, pp. 12- 27 ,(2009) , 10.1007/978-3-642-04388-8_3
Morten Elvang-Gøransson, Paul J. Krause, John Fox, Acceptability of arguments as `logical uncertainty' european conference on symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning and uncertainty. pp. 85- 90 ,(1993) , 10.1007/BFB0028186