“A 30% Chance of Rain Tomorrow”: How Does the Public Understand Probabilistic Weather Forecasts?

作者: Gerd Gigerenzer , Ralph Hertwig , Eva van den Broek , Barbara Fasolo , Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos

DOI: 10.1111/J.1539-6924.2005.00608.X

关键词:

摘要: The weather forecast says that there is a "30% chance of rain," and we think understand what it means. This quantitative statement assumed to be unambiguous convey more information than does qualitative like "It might rain tomorrow." Because the expressed as single-event probability, however, not specify class events refers to. Therefore, even numerical probabilities can interpreted by members public in multiple, mutually contradictory ways. To find out whether same about probability evokes various interpretations, randomly surveyed pedestrians five metropolises located countries have had different degrees exposure probabilistic forecasts--Amsterdam, Athens, Berlin, Milan, New York. They were asked tomorrow" means both multiple-choice free-response format. Only York did majority them supply standard meteorological interpretation, namely, when conditions are today, 3 10 cases will (at least trace of) next day. In each European cities, this alternative was judged appropriate. preferred interpretation Europe tomorrow time," followed "in 30% area." improve risk communication with public, experts need reference class, is, which refers.

参考文章(14)
David V. Budescu, Thomas S. Wallsten, Processing Linguistic Probabilities: General Principles and Empirical Evidence Psychology of Learning and Motivation. ,vol. 32, pp. 275- 318 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60313-8
John Monahan, Henry J. Steadman, Violent storms and violent people: How meteorology can inform risk communication in mental health law. American Psychologist. ,vol. 51, pp. 931- 938 ,(1996) , 10.1037/0003-066X.51.9.931
Peter A. Lachenbruch, Jacob Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 84, pp. 1096- 1097 ,(1989) , 10.2307/2290095
Allan H. Murphy, Robert L. Winkler, Forecasters and Probability Forecasts: Some Current Problems. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. ,vol. 52, pp. 239- 248 ,(1971) , 10.1175/1520-0477(1971)052<0239:FAPFSC>2.0.CO;2
Ralph L. Keeney, Detlof Winterfeldt, Improving Risk Communication Risk Analysis. ,vol. 6, pp. 417- 424 ,(1986) , 10.1111/J.1539-6924.1986.TB00954.X
Allan H. Murphy, Sarah Lichtenstein, Baruch Fischhoff, Robert L. Winkler, Misinterpretations of precipitation probability forecasts Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. ,vol. 61, pp. 695- 701 ,(1980) , 10.1175/1520-0477(1980)061<0695:MOPPF>2.0.CO;2
John E Thornes, The quality and accuracy of a sample of public and commercial weather forecasts in the UK Meteorological Applications. ,vol. 3, pp. 63- 74 ,(2007) , 10.1002/MET.5060030107