A detailed cost analysis of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment.

作者: Clazien A.M. Bouwmans , Bea M.E. Lintsen , Marinus J.C. Eijkemans , J. Dik F. Habbema , Didi D.M. Braat

DOI: 10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2007.03.003

关键词:

摘要: Objective To provide detailed information about costs of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment stages to estimate the cost per IVF ICSI cycle ongoing pregnancy. Design Descriptive micro-costing study. Setting Four Dutch centers. Patient(s) Women undergoing their first with or ICSI. Intervention(s) Main Outcome Measure(s) Costs stage, started, for Result(s) Average hormonal stimulation were €1630 €1585; oocyte retrieval €500 €725, respectively. The embryo transfer was €185. started €2381 €2578, pregnancy €10,482 €10,036, Conclusion(s) Hormonal covered main part (on average 68% 61% ICSI, respectively) due relatively high medication. medication increased increasing age women, irrespective type (IVF ICSI). Fertilization laboratory) constituted 12% 20% total 8.3% higher than IVF.

参考文章(20)
M. Granberg, A. Strandell, J. Thorburn, S. Daya, M. Wikland, Economic evaluation of infertility treatment for tubal disease. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. ,vol. 20, pp. 301- 308 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1024853322988
Peter Kovacs, Szabolcs Matyas, Artur Bernard, Steven G. Kaali, Comparison of clinical outcome and costs with CC + gonadotropins and gnrha + gonadotropins during Ivf/ICSI cycles. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. ,vol. 21, pp. 197- 202 ,(2004) , 10.1023/B:JARG.0000040234.21133.35
Adam Lloyd, Richard Kennedy, Julia Hutchinson, Will Sawyer, Economic evaluation of highly purified menotropin compared with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in assisted reproduction Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 80, pp. 1108- 1113 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)02185-X
Annika Strandell, Anette Lindhard, Ingemar Eckerlund, Cost—effectiveness analysis of salpingectomy prior to IVF, based on a randomized controlled trial Human Reproduction. ,vol. 20, pp. 3284- 3292 ,(2005) , 10.1093/HUMREP/DEI244
Suleena Kansal-Kalra, Magdy P. Milad, William A. Grobman, In vitro fertilization (IVF) versus gonadotropins followed by IVF as treatment for primary infertility : a cost-based decision analysis Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 84, pp. 600- 604 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2005.03.049
Kaylen Silverberg, Salim Daya, Jean Paul Auray, Gerald Duru, William Ledger, Matts Wikland, Renda Bouzayen, Mark O’Brien, Barri Falk, Ariel Beresniak, Analysis of the cost effectiveness of recombinant versus urinary follicle-stimulating hormone in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection programs in the United States. Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 77, pp. 107- 113 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02945-4
Jan Gerris, Petra De Sutter, Diane De Neubourg, E Van Royen, Josiane Vander Elst, K Mangelschots, M Vercruyssen, P Kok, M Elseviers, Lieven Annemans, P Pauwels, Marc Dhont, A real‐life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two‐embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles Human Reproduction. ,vol. 19, pp. 917- 923 ,(2004) , 10.1093/HUMREP/DEH188
H.G.M. Lukassen, D. D.Braat, Alex M.M. Wetzels, Gerhard A. Zielhuis, Eddy M.M. Adang, Eduard Scheenjes, Jan A.M. Kremer, Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial Human Reproduction. ,vol. 20, pp. 702- 708 ,(2005) , 10.1093/HUMREP/DEH672
Audrey A.A. Fiddelers, Aafke P.A. van Montfoort, Carmen D. Dirksen, John C.M. Dumoulin, Jolande A. Land, Gerard A.J. Dunselman, J.Marij Janssen, Johan L. Severens, Johannes L.H. Evers, Single versus double embryo transfer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial Human Reproduction. ,vol. 21, pp. 2090- 2097 ,(2006) , 10.1093/HUMREP/DEL112