Wild boar (Sus scrofa) increases species diversity of semidry grassland: Field experiment with simulated soil disturbances.

作者: Eva Horčičková , Josef Brůna , Jaroslav Vojta

DOI: 10.1002/ECE3.4950

关键词:

摘要: Background Foraging activities of wild boar (Sus scrofa) create small-scale soil disturbances in many different vegetation types. Rooting alters species composition by opening niches for less-competitive plants and, as a recurrent factor, becomes part the community disturbance regime. Vegetation responses to have mostly been studied boar's non-native range or native forest, rather than open habitats range. We investigate response European semidry grassland dominated Brachypodium pinnatum pressure an abandoned agricultural landscape. Methods To describe regime, we repeatedly mapped rooted patches during 5-year period. Additionally, study response, performed artificial experiment creating 30 pairs simulated and undisturbed plots. The paired plots was sampled five times eight years study. Results Based on repeated mapping disturbances, predict that if regime observed period were maintained over long term, it would yield stable ratio consisting 98.7% undisturbed, 0.4% with fresh disturbance, 0.9% older successional stages.Vegetation artificially disturbed continuously converging vegetation, but these still differed significantly had higher number, even after succession. Synthesis Our results thus show its increases heterogeneity diversity vegetation.

参考文章(37)
Sebastián A. Ballari, M. Noelia Barrios-García, A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges Mammal Review. ,vol. 44, pp. 124- 134 ,(2014) , 10.1111/MAM.12015
Giovanna Massei, Jonas Kindberg, Alain Licoppe, Dragan Gačić, Nikica Šprem, Jiří Kamler, Eric Baubet, Ulf Hohmann, Andrea Monaco, Janis Ozoliņš, Sandra Cellina, Tomasz Podgórski, Carlos Fonseca, Nickolay Markov, Boštjan Pokorny, Carme Rosell, András Náhlik, Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. Pest Management Science. ,vol. 71, pp. 492- 500 ,(2015) , 10.1002/PS.3965
E. J. Chaneton, J. M. Facelli, Disturbance effects on plant community diversity: spatial scales and dominance hierarchies Plant Ecology. ,vol. 93, pp. 143- 155 ,(1991) , 10.1007/BF00033208
S. Burrascano, E. Giarrizzo, S. Bonacquisti, R. Copiz, E. Del Vico, S. Fagiani, A. Mortelliti, C. Blasi, Quantifying Sus scrofa rooting effects on the understorey of the deciduous broadleaf forests in Castelporziano Estate (Italy) Rendiconti Lincei-scienze Fisiche E Naturali. ,vol. 26, pp. 317- 324 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S12210-014-0350-9
C. Guillermo Bueno, José Azorín, Daniel Gómez-García, Concepción L. Alados, David Badía, Occurrence and intensity of wild boar disturbances, effects on the physical and chemical soil properties of alpine grasslands Plant and Soil. ,vol. 373, pp. 243- 256 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S11104-013-1784-Z
Sandra Lavorel, Blaise Touzard, Jean-Dominique Lebreton, Bernard Clément, Identifying functional groups for response to disturbance in an abandoned pasture Acta Oecologica. ,vol. 19, pp. 227- 240 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S1146-609X(98)80027-1
Petr Pyšek, David M. Richardson, Marcel Rejmánek, Grady L. Webster, Mark Williamson, Jan Kirschner, Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists Taxon. ,vol. 53, pp. 131- 143 ,(2004) , 10.2307/4135498