The future of measuring patient-reported outcomes in rheumatology: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

作者: Dinesh Khanna , Eswar Krishnan , Esi Morgan Dewitt , Puja P. Khanna , Brennan Spiegel

DOI: 10.1002/ACR.20581

关键词:

摘要: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Roadmap initiative (www.nihpromis.org) is a cooperative research program designed to develop, evaluate, and standardize item banks measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs) across different medical conditions as well the US population (1). goal PROMIS develop reliable valid using response theory (IRT) that can be administered in variety formats including short forms computerized adaptive tests (CAT)(1-3). IRT often referred “modern psychometric theory,” contrast “classic test or CTT. basic idea behind both CTT there some latent construct, “trait,” underlying an illness experience. This construct cannot directly measured, but indirectly measured by creating items are scaled scored. For example, “fatigue,” “pain,” “disability,” even “happiness” constructs, i.e. subjective feelings – we take picture, snap X-Ray view them, run blood check for them. However, know they exist. People experience more less these thus it helpful try translate into several levels represented scores. models associations between construct. Specifically, describe relationships respondent's level on probability particular responses. Tests developed with (such Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index(4), Scleroderma Gastrointestinal Tract instrument(5)) require administering all items, though only appropriate persons' trait level. Some too high those low (e.g., “can you walk 100 yards” patient wheelchair) get up from chair?” runner). In contrast, methods make possible estimate person any subset pool. As such, set pool could fixed form or, greatest efficiency, CAT. CAT approach bank most informative measuring health order achieve target standard error measurement. A good will have represent range content difficulty, provide information, perform equivalently subgroups population. How does work? Without prior first typically one medium “In past 7 days I was grouchy” multi-level “never” “always.” After each response, person's associated estimated. next someone not endorsing item, “easier” item. If endorses “harder” terminated when falls below acceptable value. provides one's score minimal number questions no loss measurement precision. addition, scores studies compared common scale. scale (theta) items. All calibrated same metric independently collectively theta. Hence, estimated score. allows assessment patients differing compare arthritis heart disease) at various degrees physical other impairments, lowest highest ends levels.

参考文章(9)
Daniel J. Lovell, Murray H. Passo, Timothy Beukelman, Suzanne L. Bowyer, Beth S. Gottlieb, Michael Henrickson, Norman T. Ilowite, Yukiko Kimura, Esi Morgan DeWitt, Jill Segerman, Leonard D. Stein, Janalee Taylor, Richard K. Vehe, Edward H. Giannini, Measuring process of arthritis care: A proposed set of quality measures for the process of care in juvenile idiopathic arthritis Arthritis Care and Research. ,vol. 63, pp. 10- 16 ,(2011) , 10.1002/ACR.20348
James F. Fries, Patricia Spitz, R. Guy Kraines, Halsted R. Holman, Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis Arthritis & Rheumatism. ,vol. 23, pp. 137- 145 ,(1980) , 10.1002/ART.1780230202
Bryce B. Reeve, Ron D. Hays, Jakob B. Bjorner, Karon F. Cook, Paul K. Crane, Jeanne A. Teresi, David Thissen, Dennis A. Revicki, David J. Weiss, Ronald K. Hambleton, Honghu Liu, Richard Gershon, Steven P. Reise, Jin-shei Lai, David Cella, Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care. ,vol. 45, ,(2007) , 10.1097/01.MLR.0000250483.85507.04
Dinesh Khanna, Paul Maranian, Nan Rothrock, David Cella, Richard Gershon, Puja P. Khanna, Brennan Spiegel, Daniel E. Furst, Phil J. Clements, Amber Bechtel, Ron D. Hays, Feasibility and Construct Validity of PROMIS and “Legacy” Instruments in an Academic Scleroderma Clinic Value in Health. ,vol. 15, pp. 128- 134 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.JVAL.2011.08.006
JAMES F. FRIES, ESWAR KRISHNAN, BONNIE BRUCE, Items, Instruments, Crosswalks, and PROMIS The Journal of Rheumatology. ,vol. 36, pp. 1093- 1095 ,(2009) , 10.3899/JRHEUM.090320
JAMES F. FRIES, DAVID CELLA, MATTHIAS ROSE, ESWAR KRISHNAN, BONNIE BRUCE, Progress in Assessing Physical Function in Arthritis: PROMIS Short Forms and Computerized Adaptive Testing The Journal of Rheumatology. ,vol. 36, pp. 2061- 2066 ,(2009) , 10.3899/JRHEUM.090358
Ron D. Hays, Honghu Liu, Karen Spritzer, David Cella, Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study. Medical Care. ,vol. 45, ,(2007) , 10.1097/01.MLR.0000246649.43232.82
David Cella, Susan Yount, Nan Rothrock, Richard Gershon, Karon Cook, Bryce Reeve, Deborah Ader, James F. Fries, Bonnie Bruce, Mattias Rose, The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care. ,vol. 45, ,(2007) , 10.1097/01.MLR.0000258615.42478.55
Dinesh Khanna, Ron D. Hays, Paul Maranian, James R. Seibold, Ann Impens, Maureen D. Mayes, Philip J. Clements, Terri Getzug, Nihal Fathi, Amber Bechtel, Daniel E. Furst, Reliability and validity of the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument. Arthritis Care and Research. ,vol. 61, pp. 1257- 1263 ,(2009) , 10.1002/ART.24730