Breaking time-inversion invariance through decoherence ? Energetic consequences for attosecond neutron scattering

作者: C A Chatzidimitriou-Dreismann , E MacA Gray , T P Blach

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/380/1/012013

关键词:

摘要: Nuclei and electrons in condensed matter and/or molecules are usually entangled, due to the prevailing (mainly electromagnetic) interactions. However, "environment" of a microscopic scattering system (e.g. proton) causes ultrafast decoherence, thus making atomic nuclear entanglement effects not directly accessible experiments. our neutron Compton experiments from protons (H-atoms) systems have characteristic collisional time about 100–1000 attoseconds. The quantum dynamics an atom this ultrashort, but finite, window is governed by non-unitary evolution aforementioned decoherence. Unexpectedly, recent theoretical investigations shown that decoherence can also following energetic consequences. Disentangling two subsystems A B AB tantamount erasure phase relations between B. This widely believed be innocuous process, which e.g. does affect energies independent groups proved recently disentangling systems, within sufficiently short interval, increase their energies. derivable simplest Lindblad-type master equation one particle being subject pure Our neutron-proton with H2 provide for first experimental evidence effect. results reveal collision, leading cleavage H-H bond attosecond timescale, accompanied larger energy transfer (by 2–3%) than conventional theory predicts. Preliminary current show qualitatively same effect neutron-deuteron D2 molecules. We interpret findings treating (or neutron-deuteron) as entangled open fast caused its (i.e., plus second nucleus or D2). presented seem generic nature, may considerable consequences various processes molecules, elementary chemical reactions.

参考文章(70)
Leslie E Ballentine, Quantum mechanics : a modern development QUANTUM MECHANICS: A MODERN DEVELOPMENT. Edited by BALLENTINE LESLIE E. Published by World Scientific Press. ,(1998) , 10.1142/3142
A. N. Antonov, I. S. Bonev, Chr V. Christov, I. Zh. Petkov, Generator coordinate calculations of nucleon momentum and density distributions in4He,16O and40Ca Nuovo Cimento Della Societa Italiana Di Fisica A-nuclei Particles and Fields. ,vol. 100, pp. 779- 788 ,(1988) , 10.1007/BF02813324
R. A. Bonham, G. Cooper, A. P. Hitchcock, Electron Compton-like quasielastic scattering from H2, D2, and HD. Journal of Chemical Physics. ,vol. 130, pp. 144303- 144303 ,(2009) , 10.1063/1.3108490
N.G. Van Kampen, Quantum statistics of irreversible processes Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. ,vol. 20, pp. 603- 622 ,(1954) , 10.1016/S0031-8914(54)80074-7
B Gaveau, L S Schulman, Energetic consequences of decoherence at small times for coupled systems Journal of Physics A. ,vol. 43, pp. 055308- ,(2010) , 10.1088/1751-8113/43/5/055308
Henry W. Kendall, Deep Inelastic Scattering: Experiments on the Proton and the Observation of Scaling Reviews of Modern Physics. ,vol. 63, pp. 597- 614 ,(1991) , 10.1103/REVMODPHYS.63.597
Eleftherios Goulielmakis, Zhi-Heng Loh, Adrian Wirth, Robin Santra, Nina Rohringer, Vladislav S. Yakovlev, Sergey Zherebtsov, Thomas Pfeifer, Abdallah M. Azzeer, Matthias F. Kling, Stephen R. Leone, Ferenc Krausz, Real-time observation of valence electron motion Nature. ,vol. 466, pp. 739- 743 ,(2010) , 10.1038/NATURE09212
Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, Nathan Rosen, None, Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review. ,vol. 47, pp. 777- 780 ,(1935) , 10.1103/PHYSREV.47.777