Assessing the efficacy of the Measure of Understanding of Macroevolution as a valid tool for undergraduate non-science majors

作者: William Lee Romine , Emily Marie Walter

DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2014.938376

关键词:

摘要: Efficacy of the Measure Understanding Macroevolution (MUM) as a measurement tool has been point contention among scholars needing valid measure for knowledge macroevolution. We explored structure and construct validity MUM using Rasch methodologies in context general education biology course designed with an emphasis on macroevolution content. The model was utilized to quantify item- test-level characteristics, including dimensionality, reliability, fit model. Contrary previous work, we found that provides valid, reliable, unidimensional scale measuring introductory non-science majors, its psychometric behavior does not exhibit large changes across time. While all items provide productive information, several depart substantially from ideal behavior, warranting collective effort improve these items. Suggestions improving characteri...

参考文章(29)
John Michael Linacre, Detecting Multidimensionality: Which Residual Data-Type Works Best?. Journal of Outcome Measurement. ,vol. 2, pp. 266- ,(1998)
Benjamin Drake Wright, Mark H. Stone, Best test design Mesa Press. ,(1979)
A. Birnbaum, Some latent train models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. pp. 395- 479 ,(1968)
Louis S. Nadelson, Sherry A. Southerland, Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Measure of Understanding of Macroevolution: Introducing the MUM Journal of Experimental Education. ,vol. 78, pp. 151- 190 ,(2009) , 10.1080/00220970903292983
Thomas M. Haladyna, Steven M. Downing, How Many Options is Enough for a Multiple-Choice Test Item? Educational and Psychological Measurement. ,vol. 53, pp. 999- 1010 ,(1993) , 10.1177/0013164493053004013
Laura R. Novick, Kefyn M. Catley, Assessing Students' Understanding of Macroevolution: Concerns regarding the validity of the MUM International Journal of Science Education. ,vol. 34, pp. 2679- 2703 ,(2012) , 10.1080/09500693.2012.727496