Long-run Performance of Public vs. Private Sector Initial Public Offerings in Pakistan

作者: Muhammad Faisal Rizwan , Safi-Ullah Khan

DOI: 10.30541/V46I4IIPP.421-433

关键词:

摘要: The private sector had its major share in the economic development of country early years independence 1950s. However, suffered a set back 1970s, when huge process nationalisation large number industrial units was undertaken by then government. Over decades these enterprises were not professionally managed and political influences management running played havoc with them consequently experiment proved to be failure. Attending weaknesses inefficiencies inherent public enterprises, privatisation systematically initiated government 1990s. Various commissions up subsequent got some momentum during present many profitable firms privatised last few years, particularly at time overall climate responsive conducive for investment. government, however, through offerings on individual-case basis. objectives this paper, therefore, are; first, what degree Privatisation Initial Public Offering’s (IPOs henceforth) IPOs differ terms under-pricing Pakistan? Second, find out reasons IPOs. Third, how can we compare long-run performance IPOs? In Pakistan, employ fixed-price method go shares are sold lots each lot consisting 100, 200, 500 or multiple lots. An investor apply only one pre-announced subscription price. case over investors, company reserves rights subscribe certain percentage amount equity. Empirical evidence Pakistan stock market is generally scarce. Especially, Pakistani Private non-existent. Sohail Nasr (2007) study, our knowledge, have been conducted who investigated 50 period 2001 2005 that subsequently listed Karachi exchange. They significant under pricing reported an average

参考文章(17)
Mohamed Nasr, Muhammad Khalid Sohail, Performance of Initial Public Offerings in Pakistan ,(2007)
Wolfgang Aussenegg, Privatization Versus Private Sector Initial Public Offerings in Poland Social Science Research Network. ,(2006)
Ranko Jelic, Richard Briston, Hungarian Privatisation Strategy and Financial Performance of Privatised Companies Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. ,vol. 26, pp. 1319- 1357 ,(1999) , 10.1111/1468-5957.00300
Kojo Menyah, Krishna N. Paudyal, Charles G. Inyangete, The Pricing of Initial Offerings of Privatised Companies on the London Stock Exchange Accounting and Business Research. ,vol. 21, pp. 51- 56 ,(1990) , 10.1080/00014788.1990.9729403
Nickolaos V. Tsangarakis, The price performance of initial public offerings in Greece Managerial Finance. ,vol. 30, pp. 26- 44 ,(2004) , 10.1108/03074350410769335
K. Paudyal, B. Saadouni, R.J. Briston, Privatisation initial public offerings in Malaysia: Initial premium and long-term performance Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. ,vol. 6, pp. 427- 451 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0927-538X(98)00018-3
Ranko Jelic, Richard Briston, Privatisation Initial Public Offerings: the Polish Experience European Financial Management. ,vol. 9, pp. 457- 484 ,(2003) , 10.1111/1468-036X.00232
Adam Steen, Keith Kendall, Long‐run performance of privatized government monopolies: Australian experience Managerial Finance. ,vol. 30, pp. 63- 74 ,(2004) , 10.1108/03074350410768840
S Jones, Share issue privatizations as financial means to political and economic ends Journal of Financial Economics. ,vol. 53, pp. 217- 253 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00021-5
MARK GRINBLATT, CHUAN YANG HWANG, Signalling and the Pricing of New Issues Journal of Finance. ,vol. 44, pp. 393- 420 ,(1989) , 10.1111/J.1540-6261.1989.TB05063.X