摘要: My primary interest in this article is to reveal the complexity of neoliberal temporalities on lives disabled people forced participate workfare regimes maintain access social security measures and programming. Through drawing upon some contemporary debates arising within study time, explicates what Jessop refers as sovereignty time that has emerged with global adoption regimes. It argued central role temporality globalizing project positioning disability these macro-structural processes requires sociological imagination return both a theme methodology.
sagepub.com
curtin.edu.au参考文章(47)
Judith Bessant, CIVIL CONSCRIPTION OR RECIPROCAL OBLIGATION: THE ETHICS OF ‘WORK-FOR-THE-DOLE’ Australian Journal of Social Issues. ,vol. 35, pp. 15- 33 ,(2000) , 10.1002/J.1839-4655.2000.TB01301.X
Ange-Marie Hancock, The Politics of Disgust: The Public Identity of the Welfare Queen NYU Press. ,(2004)
Colin Barnes, Alan Roulstone, Working futures?: Disabled people, policy and social inclusion ,(2005)
Rosemarie Garland Thomson, Freakery : cultural spectacles of the extraordinary body New York University Press. ,(1996)
Brendan Gleeson, Geographies of disability ,(1998)
Brendan Gleeson, Mike Clear, Disability and materialist embodiment Journal of Australian Political Economy. ,vol. 49, pp. 34- 55 ,(2002)
Susan Wendell, The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability ,(1996)
Barbara Adam, Timewatch: The Social Analysis of Time ,(1995)
Ernie Lightman, Andrea Vick, Dean Herd, Andrew Mitchell, ‘Not disabled enough’: Episodic disabilities and the Ontario Disability Support Program Disability Studies Quarterly. ,vol. 29, ,(2009) , 10.18061/DSQ.V29I3.932
New landscapes of urban poverty management Routledge. pp. 161- 180 ,(2001) , 10.4324/9780203360675-11