Optimising the design of phase II oncology trials: The importance of randomisation

作者: Mark J. Ratain , Daniel J. Sargent

DOI: 10.1016/J.EJCA.2008.10.029

关键词:

摘要: Oncology trial end-points continue to receive considerable attention, as illustrated by the development and revisions RECIST criteria. In this article, we focus reader away from issue of for phase II trials towards what believe be an even more important issue, fundamental need randomisation in oncology trials, ideally with blinding dose-ranging. We present arguments support proposition that will enable greater clarity interpretation results, well allowing precise estimates effect size sample requirements definitive III trials. Randomisation also reduce potential bias resulting inter-trial variability, which inflates both type I errors if historical controls are utilised. context a randomised blinded trial, exact choice end-point is less critical, although favour such change tumour or progression status at fixed early time point (i.e. 8-12 weeks after randomisation). Although based on criteria can should utilised do not revision result improvement drug decisions absence clinical stage development.

参考文章(22)
R. Simon, P. F. Thall, S. S. Ellenberg, New designs for the selection of treatments to be tested in randomized clinical trials Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 13, pp. 417- 429 ,(1994) , 10.1002/SIM.4780130506
Daniel J. Schaid, James N. Ingle, Sam Wieand, David L. Ahmann, A design for phase II testing of anticancer agents within a phase III clinical trial Controlled Clinical Trials. ,vol. 9, pp. 107- 118 ,(1988) , 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90032-3
P.Y Liu, Michael LeBlanc, Manisha Desai, False positive rates of randomized phase II designs. Controlled Clinical Trials. ,vol. 20, pp. 343- 352 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0197-2456(99)00009-4
Peter F. Thall, Richard Simon, Practical Bayesian guidelines for phase IIB clinical trials. Biometrics. ,vol. 50, pp. 337- 349 ,(1994) , 10.2307/2533377
Daniel J. Sargent, Victor Chan, Richard M. Goldberg, A Three-Outcome Design for Phase II Clinical Trials Controlled Clinical Trials. ,vol. 22, pp. 117- 125 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00115-X
Daniel J. Sargent, Richard M. Goldberg, A flexible design for multiple armed screening trials. Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 20, pp. 1051- 1060 ,(2001) , 10.1002/SIM.704
Richard Simon, Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials. ,vol. 10, pp. 1- 10 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9
Daniel J. Sargent, Daniel F. Hayes, Assessing the Measure of a New Drug: Is Survival the Only Thing That Matters? Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 26, pp. 1922- 1923 ,(2008) , 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8064