摘要: The biological study of behavior was shaped by the divorce between ethology and behavioral ecology twenty years ago. Whereas heirs promote a phenomenological behaviors, ecologists focus on their fitness consequences. I argue that both schools share same blind spot about link evolutionary past making up individual because common acceptance dichotomy ultimate proximate causation. By maintaining pan-selectionist view evolution in behavior, hampers exploring how epigenetic processes affect adaptive trade-offs. Giving would give impetus to research programs investigate traits associate clusters through development evolution. It further comprehensive phenotypes, reunification biology an attainable goal.
brill.com
archives-ouvertes.fr
brillonline.com 参考文章(70)
Kurt Schwenk, Günter P. Wagner, The relativism of constraints on phenotypic evolution ,(2004)
Paul E. Griffiths, Russell D. Cray, The Developmental Systems Perspective ,(2004)
André Ariew, Ernst Mayr's 'ultimate / proximate' distinction reconsidered and reconstructed Biology and Philosophy. ,vol. 18, pp. 553- 565 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1025565119032
A. S. Wilkins, The Evolution of Developmental Pathways ,(2001)
Stephen Jay Gould, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory ,(2002)
Mary Jane West-Eberhard, Developmental plasticity and evolution ,(2003)
Mark Pagel, George C. Williams, Natural selection : domains, levels, and challenges. Journal of Animal Ecology. ,vol. 63, pp. 212- ,(1994) , 10.2307/5601
C. H. Waddington, The evolution of an evolutionist ,(1975)
Sara J. Shettleworth, Cognition, evolution, and behavior ,(1998)
John Maynard Smith, Evolution and the Theory of Games ,(1982)