Efficacy of Ropel® as a coyote repellent

作者: Julie K. Young , Elizabeth A. Miller , Scott Stelting , Bruce A. Kimball

DOI: 10.26077/VGQG-F189

关键词:

摘要: We examined the repellency of a commercially available animal repellent to determine efficacy its application objects that are attractive coyotes (Canis latrans). Specifically, we aimed both prevent chewing behavior by on nylon-like strapping material, which is used construct barrier-arresting systems military airstrips, and ability solution animals from repeating undesired behavior. mixed Ropel® Animal Rodent Repellent with liquid latex sticker form 2% 98% Ropel solution. water as control. The solutions were applied test material placed in coyote pens. exposed 12 mated pairs control 2-choice recorded toward materials using camera traps. Photographs condition when, if, individual approached, made contact with, tasted, repeatedly or destroyed material. There was no difference between number treatment but significantly more tasted than materials. However, there destroyed. While results suggest some properties after initial tasting, do not recommend this product be relied upon coyote-specific repellent.

参考文章(18)
Frederick F. Knowlton, Eric M. Gese, Michael M. Jaeger, Coyote depredation control: an interface between biology and management Journal of Range Management. ,vol. 52, pp. 398- 412 ,(1999) , 10.2307/4003765
Doris , E. Zemlicka, J. , Russell Mason, Response of Captive Coyotes to Renardine Coyote Repellent Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference. ,vol. 19, ,(2000) , 10.5070/V419110289
Richard E. Griffiths Jr., Guy E. Connolly, Richard J. Burns, REPELLENT OR AVERSIVE CHEMICALS IN SHEEP NECK COLLARS DID NOT DETER COYOTE ATTACKS Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference. ,vol. 11, ,(1984)
Rodney D. Sayler, Michael J. Pipas, Gary W. Witmer, Repellent Trials to Reduce Reforestation Damage by Pocket Gophers, Deer, and Elk ,(1995)
J. , Russell Mason, Mammal repellents: options and considerations for development Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference. ,vol. 18, ,(1998) , 10.5070/V418110271
William F. Andelt, Dan L. Baker, Kenneth P. Burnham, RELATIVE PREFERENCE OF CAPTIVE COW ELK FOR REPELLENT-TREATED DIETS Journal of Wildlife Management. ,vol. 56, pp. 164- 173 ,(1992) , 10.2307/3808805
C. R. Gustavson, J. Garcia, W. G. Hankins, K. W. Rusiniak, Coyote predation control by aversive conditioning. Science. ,vol. 184, pp. 581- 583 ,(1974) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.184.4136.581
Stephen F. Davis, Cathy A. Grover, Cynthia A. Erickson, Lynn A. Miller, Julie A. Bowman, Analyzing aversiveness of denatonium saccharide and quinine in rats. Perceptual and Motor Skills. ,vol. 64, pp. 1215- 1222 ,(1987) , 10.2466/PMS.1987.64.3C.1215
A. D. Woolhouse, D. R. Morgan, An evaluation of repellents to suppress browsing by possums. Journal of Chemical Ecology. ,vol. 21, pp. 1571- 1583 ,(1995) , 10.1007/BF02035153
Paul Rozin, Leslie Gruss, Geoffrey Berk, Reversal of innate aversions: Attempts to induce a preference for chili peppers in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. ,vol. 93, pp. 1001- 1014 ,(1979) , 10.1037/H0077632