Pollution tax, partial privatization and environment

作者: Rupayan Pal , Bibhas Saha

DOI: 10.1016/J.RESENEECO.2015.01.004

关键词:

摘要: Considering a differentiated mixed duopoly we show that when privatization and pollution tax are used together environmental damage will be non-monotone in the level of privatization, and optimal privatization is always partial privatization. Whether privatization will improve the environment or not depends on the public firm's concern for environment. If the public firm is unconcerned about environment, the socially optimal privatization will also damage the environment most. But when the public firm is concerned about environment …

参考文章(34)
Narjess Boubakri, Jean-Claude Cosset, Omrane Guedhami, Privatisation in Developing Countries: Performance and Ownership Effects Development Policy Review. ,vol. 26, pp. 275- 308 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1467-7679.2008.00411.X
Susumu Cato, Privatization and the Environment Economics Bulletin. ,vol. 12, pp. 1- 10 ,(2008)
Rabindra N. Bhattacharya, Rupayan Pal, Environmental standards as strategic outcomes: A simple model Resource and Energy Economics. ,vol. 32, pp. 408- 420 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.RESENEECO.2009.11.001
Joan Robinson, A Simple Model Palgrave Macmillan, London. pp. 63- 71 ,(1969) , 10.1007/978-0-230-30666-0_7
William L Megginson, Jeffry M Netter, From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization Journal of Economic Literature. ,vol. 39, pp. 321- 389 ,(2001) , 10.1257/JEL.39.2.321
Bernardo Bortolotti, Mara Faccio, Government Control of Privatized Firms Review of Financial Studies. ,vol. 22, pp. 2907- 2939 ,(2009) , 10.1093/RFS/HHN077
Juan Carlos Bárcena-Ruiz, María Begoña Garzón, Environmental taxes and strategic delegation Spanish Economic Review. ,vol. 4, pp. 301- 309 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S101080200052
RUPAYAN PAL, DELEGATION AND EMISSION TAX IN A DIFFERENTIATED OLIGOPOLY The Manchester School. ,vol. 80, pp. 650- 670 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1467-9957.2011.02253.X
RUPAYAN PAL, BIBHAS SAHA, Mixed Duopoly and Environment Journal of Public Economic Theory. ,vol. 16, pp. 96- 118 ,(2014) , 10.1111/JPET.12056