Defining and evaluating novel procedures for involving patients in Core Outcome Set research: creating a meaningful long list of candidate outcome domains.

作者: Harriet Smith , , Adele Horobin , Kathryn Fackrell , Veronica Colley

DOI: 10.1186/S40900-018-0091-5

关键词:

摘要: Outcome domains are aspects of a condition that matter to patients and clinicians can be measured assess treatment effects. For tinnitus, examples include ‘tinnitus loudness’ ‘ability concentrate’. This study focuses on the first stage agreeing which outcome should in all clinical trials tinnitus. Crucially, it involves identifying domains, prior voting process. article describes how we effectively involved design process, reflects impact their input. The compiled long list possible before asking interested parties, including patients, vote ones include. Ensuring fully participate this process holds unique challenges as long, repetitive its purpose far removed from needs. These may addressed by involving designing research. There is evidence other research teams doing this, but reporting not detailed enough guide others. Our paper seeks address this. We describe (people living with tinnitus) creating included our study. also reflect benefits brought. Two partnered us survey. consulted an independent patient review panel. Involving reduced survey made domain names associated descriptions clearer. resulting performed well recruiting retaining participants. Background Tinnitus complex audiological affecting many different everyday life. Clinical tinnitus interventions measure report those inconsistently hinders direct comparison between findings. To problem, ongoing project developing Core Set; agreed reported future trials. Part uses consensus methodology (‘Delphi’ survey), whereby relevant stakeholders identify important critical candidates. addresses gap involvement literature describing reflecting create meaningful candidate domains. Methods Public Research Partners lived experience reviewed initial 124 over two face-to-face workshops. With Study Management Team, they interpreted each generated plain language description. Following underwent additional lay 14 5 experts, via online platform. Results Insights gained workshops feedback prompted substantial, unforeseen modifications list. reduction number (from 66) exclusion broad concepts consolidation equivalent or outside scope Reviewers applied bring clarity relevance descriptions. Four impacts Delphi were observed: recruitment exceeded target 171%, there numbers professional participants (n = 358 n = 312, respectively), was mostly positive, retention high (87%). Conclusions Patient integral transformative step impactful because successful participants, comments about positive participatory experience. Seven general methodological features highlighted fit principles good involvement. benefit Set developers.

参考文章(31)
V. Wylde, F. MacKichan, J. Bruce, R. Gooberman‐Hill, Assessment of chronic post-surgical pain after knee replacement: Development of a core outcome set European Journal of Pain. ,vol. 19, pp. 611- 620 ,(2015) , 10.1002/EJP.582
Iain Bruce, Nicola Harman, Paula Williamson, Stephanie Tierney, Peter Callery, Syed Mohiuddin, Katherine Payne, Elisabeth Fenwick, Jamie Kirkham, Kevin O’Brien, The management of Otitis Media with Effusion in children with cleft palate (mOMEnt): a feasibility study and economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment. ,vol. 19, pp. 1- 374 ,(2015) , 10.3310/HTA19680
Elizabeth Gargon, Binu Gurung, Nancy Medley, Doug G. Altman, Jane M. Blazeby, Mike Clarke, Paula R. Williamson, Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review. PLOS ONE. ,vol. 9, ,(2014) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0099111
Alessandro Chiarotto, Richard A Deyo, Caroline B Terwee, Maarten Boers, Rachelle Buchbinder, Terry P Corbin, Leonardo OP Costa, Nadine E Foster, Margreth Grotle, Bart W Koes, Francisco M Kovacs, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Chris G Maher, Adam M Pearson, Wilco C Peul, Mark L Schoene, Dennis C Turk, Maurits W Van Tulder, Raymond W Ostelo, None, Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain European Spine Journal. ,vol. 24, pp. 1127- 1142 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S00586-015-3892-3
Paula R Williamson, Douglas G Altman, Jane M Blazeby, Mike Clarke, Declan Devane, Elizabeth Gargon, Peter Tugwell, Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. ,vol. 13, pp. 132- 132 ,(2012) , 10.1186/1745-6215-13-132
Deborah A. Hall, Haúla Haider, Dimitris Kikidis, Marzena Mielczarek, Birgit Mazurek, Agnieszka J. Szczepek, Christopher R. Cederroth, Toward a Global Consensus on Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials in Tinnitus: Report From the First International Meeting of the COMiT Initiative, November 14, 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Trends in hearing. ,vol. 19, pp. 2331216515580272- ,(2015) , 10.1177/2331216515580272
Ian P Sinha, Ruairi Gallagher, Paula R Williamson, Rosalind L Smyth, Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in childhood asthma: a survey of clinicians, parents, and young people. Trials. ,vol. 13, pp. 103- 103 ,(2012) , 10.1186/1745-6215-13-103
Nicola L. Harman, Iain A. Bruce, Jamie J. Kirkham, Stephanie Tierney, Peter Callery, Kevin O'Brien, Alex M. D. Bennett, Raouf Chorbachi, Per N. Hall, Anne Harding-Bell, Victoria H. Parfect, Nichola Rumsey, Debbie Sell, Ravi Sharma, Paula R. Williamson, The Importance of Integration of Stakeholder Views in Core Outcome Set Development: Otitis Media with Effusion in Children with Cleft Palate PLOS ONE. ,vol. 10, pp. e0129514- ,(2015) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0129514
Janneke Van't Hooft, James MN Duffy, Mandy Daly, Paula R Williamson, Shireen Meher, Elizabeth Thom, George R Saade, Zarko Alfirevic, Ben Willem J Mol, Khalid S Khan, None, A Core Outcome Set for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 127, pp. 49- 58 ,(2016) , 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001195