Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: a meta-analysis.

作者: Oliver Lindhiem , Charles B. Bennett , Christopher J. Trentacosta , Caitlin McLear

DOI: 10.1016/J.CPR.2014.06.002

关键词:

摘要: We conducted a meta-analysis on the effects of client preferences treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome. Our search literature resulted in 34 empirical articles describing 32 unique trials that either randomized some clients to an active choice condition (shared decision making or treatment) assessed preferences. Clients who were involved shared making, chose condition, otherwise received their preferred evidenced higher satisfaction (ESd=.34; p<.001), increased completion rates (ESOR=1.37; ESd=.17; superior outcome (ESd=.15; p<.0001), compared not did choose receive treatment. Although effect sizes are modest magnitude, they generally consistent across several potential moderating variables including study design (preference versus choice), psychoeducation (informed uninformed), setting (inpatient outpatient), diagnosis (mental health other), unit randomization (client provider). findings highlight benefit assessing preferences, providing choices when two more efficacious options available, involving treatment-related decisions available.

参考文章(73)
Robert J. Calsyn, Joel P. Winter, Gary A. Morse, Do consumers who have a choice of treatment have better outcomes Community Mental Health Journal. ,vol. 36, pp. 149- 160 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1001890210218
Mark W.. Lipsey, David B Wilson, None, Practical Meta-Analysis ,(2000)
Dana Steidtmann, Rachel Manber, Bruce A. Arnow, Daniel N. Klein, John C. Markowitz, Barbara O. Rothbaum, Michael E. Thase, James H. Kocsis, PATIENT TREATMENT PREFERENCE AS A PREDICTOR OF RESPONSE AND ATTRITION IN TREATMENT FOR CHRONIC DEPRESSION Depression and Anxiety. ,vol. 29, pp. 896- 905 ,(2012) , 10.1002/DA.21977
Roland Mergl, Verena Henkel, Antje-Kathrin Allgaier, Dietmar Kramer, Martin Hautzinger, Ralf Kohnen, James Coyne, Ulrich Hegerl, Are treatment preferences relevant in response to serotonergic antidepressants and cognitive-behavioral therapy in depressed primary care patients? Results from a randomized controlled trial including a patients' choice arm Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. ,vol. 80, pp. 39- 47 ,(2011) , 10.1159/000318772
Brian M Iacoviello, Kevin Scott McCarthy, Marna S Barrett, Moira Rynn, Robert Gallop, Jacques P Barber, None, Treatment preferences affect the therapeutic alliance: implications for randomized controlled trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. ,vol. 75, pp. 194- 198 ,(2007) , 10.1037/0022-006X.75.1.194
Christiane Bieber, Knut Georg Müller, Klaus Blumenstiel, Achim Hochlehnert, Stefanie Wilke, Mechthild Hartmann, Wolfgang Eich, A shared decision-making communication training program for physicians treating fibromyalgia patients: Effects of a randomized controlled trial Journal of Psychosomatic Research. ,vol. 64, pp. 13- 20 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.JPSYCHORES.2007.05.009
Robert C. Sterling, Edward Gottheil, Scott D. Classman, Stephen P. Weinstein, Ronald D. Serota, Patient Treatment Choice and Compliance:Data from a Substance Abuse Treatment Program American Journal on Addictions. ,vol. 6, pp. 168- 176 ,(1997) , 10.3109/10550499709137028
R. Kathryn McHugh, Sarah W. Whitton, Andrew D. Peckham, Jeffrey A. Welge, Michael W. Otto, Patient Preference for Psychological vs Pharmacologic Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: A Meta-Analytic Review The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. ,vol. 74, pp. 595- 602 ,(2013) , 10.4088/JCP.12R07757
Robert West, Peter Hajek, Fredrik Nilsson, Jonathan Foulds, Sylvia May, Anna Meadows, Individual differences in preferences for and responses to four nicotine replacement products. Psychopharmacology. ,vol. 153, pp. 225- 230 ,(2001) , 10.1007/S002130000577
Timothy P Baardseth, Simon B Goldberg, Brian T Pace, Andrew P Wislocki, Nick D Frost, Jamila R Siddiqui, Abigail M Lindemann, D Martin Kivlighan III, Kevin M Laska, Aaron C Del Re, Takuya Minami, Bruce E Wampold, None, Cognitive-behavioral therapy versus other therapies: Redux Clinical Psychology Review. ,vol. 33, pp. 395- 405 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.CPR.2013.01.004