摘要: What do the strong emotional reactions to European Union’s Eurozone crisismanagement tell us about normativity of Union (EU)? Why is more expected by institutions when collective action constrained politics states? The EU has no competence in fiscal matters; it cannot redistribute resources, issue state bonds, print money, and sovereign tax basis. Central Bank (ECB) act as a lender last resort. These competencies rest with member states. This all well known result states’ unwillingness surrender sovereignty grant powers Union. All same this not prevented social groups, political parties intellectuals from demanding resolute curb crisis.
springer.com
sci-hub.st 参考文章(51)
Hans-Jörg Trenz, Paul Statham, The Politicization of Europe: Contesting the Constitution in the Mass Media ,(2012)
Benjamin Herborth, Peter Niesen, Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit Suhrkamp. ,(2007)
Kaarlo Heikki Tuori, The European Financial Crisis: - Constitutional Aspects and Implications Social Science Research Network. pp. 1- 49 ,(2012) , 10.2139/SSRN.2171824
Jürgen Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere ,(1962)
Anne Peters, Elemente einer Theorie der Verfassung Europas Veröffentlichungen des Walther-Schücking-Instituts für Internationales Recht an der Universität Kiel. ,(2013) , 10.3790/978-3-428-50602-6
Matej Avbelj, Jan Komárek, Constitutional pluralism in the European Union and beyond Hart Publishing. ,(2012)
John A. Agnew, Globalization and Sovereignty ,(2009)
Tanja Hitzel-Cassagnes, Die Verfassung des Transnationalen : reflexive Ordnungsbildung jenseits des Staates Nomos. ,(2012)
Rainer Schmalz-Bruns, Reflexive Demokratie Nomos. ,(1995) , 10.5771/9783845261416
Hauke Brunkhorst, Peter Niesen, Das Recht der Republik Suhrkamp. ,(1999)