Using Public Preferences to Weight Species Prioritization Criteria in Conservation Decision Making: A Case Study to Explore Potential Strengths and Weaknesses

作者: Carina Vieira da Silva , Lívia Madureira , José L. Costa , José L. Santos

DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2016.1171937

关键词:

摘要: The conservation of biodiversity depends on the implementation policy with limited financial resources. Due to this shortage resources, activities must be prioritized so that scarce funds are used rationally prevent long-term loss. To assure funding continuity, since it is public pays a significant part costs, imperative managers and policymakers apply in way makes people feel their concerns about loss addressed. Here we argue for preferences incorporated species decision making through criteria weighting. Public were analyzed two different contexts (abstract vs. concrete) understand how stable across elicitation procedures. Our results show some resilience ranking, functional importance being considered as top criterion ways questioning.

参考文章(72)
Belinda Reyers, Alberts S. Van Jaarsveld, Melodie A. McGEOCH, Alexander N. James, National biodiversity risk assessment: a composite multivariate and index approach Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 7, pp. 945- 965 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1008881405539
David L. Morgan, Planning Focus Groups ,(1997)
Tabatha J. Wallington, Richard J. Hobbs, Susan A. Moore, Implications of Current Ecological Thinking for Biodiversity Conservation: a Review of the Salient Issues Ecology and Society. ,vol. 10, pp. 15-1- 15-15 ,(2005) , 10.5751/ES-01256-100115
Metrick, Andrew Weitzman, Martin L., Patterns of Behavior in Biodiversity Preservation Land Economics. ,vol. 72, pp. 1- 16 ,(1994)
Nigel Leader-Williams, Georgina M. Mace, Hugh P. Possingham, Prioritizing choices in conservation Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. pp. 17- 34 ,(2007)
Robert J. Lambeck, Focal Species: A Multi-Species Umbrella for Nature Conservation Conservation Biology. ,vol. 11, pp. 849- 856 ,(1997) , 10.1046/J.1523-1739.1997.96319.X