Zooarchaeology and the elusive feast: from performance to aftermath

作者: Peter Rowley-Conwy

DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2018.1445024

关键词:

摘要: Ethnographic descriptions of feasts reveal that consumption meat is usually prominent. Zooarchaeological evidence may thus provide the best way seeing in archaeological record. The accumulation trophy arrays and ongoing high-status activities are confusing behaviours be misconstrued as feasts. A four-fold classification zooarchaeological for put forward: ‘over top’ (high status); ‘ritually charged garbage’ (often religious); ‘small but special’ (nevertheless sometimes visible); ‘was this feasting?’ (sometimes equivocal). This typology allow archaeologists to distinguish between ethnographic categories competitive solidarity

参考文章(48)
Julian Thomas, Understanding the neolithic ,(1999)
Michael Parker Pearson, Karen Godden, Jean-Luc Schwenninger, Georges Heurtebize, Chantal Radimilahy, Helen Smith, Pastoralists, Warriors and Colonists: The Archaeology of Southern Madagascar ,(2010)
PETER ROWLEY-CONWY, ANDREW C. OWEN, GROOVED WARE FEASTING IN YORKSHIRE: LATE NEOLITHIC ANIMAL CONSUMPTION AT RUDSTON WOLD Oxford Journal of Archaeology. ,vol. 30, pp. 325- 367 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1468-0092.2011.00371.X
C. G. Seligman, Francis Rickman Barton, E. L. Giblin, The Melanesians of British New Guinea ,(2017)
Simon Davis, Sebastian Payne, A barrow full of cattle skulls Antiquity. ,vol. 67, pp. 12- 22 ,(1993) , 10.1017/S0003598X00045026
Martin Jones, Feast: Why Humans Share Food ,(2007)