The paradox of hearing at the lek: auditory sensitivity increases after breeding in female gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis)

作者: Alexander T. Baugh , Mark A. Bee , Megan D. Gall

DOI: 10.1007/S00359-019-01354-0

关键词:

摘要: Both behavioral receptivity and neural sensitivity to acoustic mate attraction signals vary across the reproductive cycle, particularly in seasonally breeding animals. Across a variety of taxa increases, as does peripheral auditory sensitivity, females transition from non-breeding condition. We recently documented decreases circulating hormone levels, but an increase call-like stimuli following oviposition Cope’s gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis). However, it is not known if changes are confined frequency range calls, or they result more generalized periphery. Here, we used brainstem responses (ABRs) evaluate female before after oviposition. found lower ABR thresholds, greater amplitudes, shorter latencies Changes were most pronounced consistent at frequencies associated with amphibian papilla, also detectable higher corresponding tuning basilar papilla. Furthermore, only correlated steroid hormones (testosterone). processing may metabolic function sensorineural adaptation chorus noise.

参考文章(66)
James C. Saunders, R. Keith Duncan, Daryl E. Doan, Yehudah L. Werner, The Middle Ear of Reptiles and Birds Springer New York. pp. 13- 69 ,(2000) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-1182-2_2
Matthew J. Mason, Pathways for Sound Transmission to the Inner Ear in Amphibians Springer, New York, NY. pp. 147- 183 ,(2007) , 10.1007/978-0-387-47796-1_6
Richard J. Salvi, Overview: Regeneration and Repair Springer, New York, NY. pp. 1- 37 ,(2008) , 10.1007/978-0-387-73364-7_1
John J. Guinan, Physiology of Olivocochlear Efferents Springer, New York, NY. pp. 435- 502 ,(1996) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-0757-3_8
M. D. TUTTLE, M. J. RYAN, Bat Predation and the Evolution of Frog Vocalizations in the Neotropics Science. ,vol. 214, pp. 677- 678 ,(1981) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.214.4521.677
Jason A. Miranda, Walter Wilczynski, Female reproductive state influences the auditory midbrain response Journal of Comparative Physiology A-neuroethology Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology. ,vol. 195, pp. 341- 349 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S00359-008-0410-7
Thomas E. Hetherington, The middle ear muscle of frogs does not modulate tympanic responses to sound. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 95, pp. 2122- 2125 ,(1994) , 10.1121/1.408673
Joseph A Sisneros, Paul M Forlano, David L Deitcher, Andrew H Bass, None, Steroid-Dependent Auditory Plasticity Leads to Adaptive Coupling of Sender and Receiver Science. ,vol. 305, pp. 404- 407 ,(2004) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1097218