Differential Item Functioning in Biodata: Opportunity Access as an Explanation of Gender- and Race-Related DIF.
作者： Anna Imus , Neal Schmitt , Brian Kim , Frederick L Oswald , Stephanie Merritt
DOI: 10.1080/08957347.2011.532412
关键词:
摘要: Investigations of differential item functioning (DIF) have been conducted mostly on ability tests and found little evidence easily interpretable differences across various demographic subgroups. In this study, we examined the degree to which DIF in biographical data items referencing academically relevant background, experiences, interests was related judgments about access these experiences by members different gender race location parameter significantly (r = –.51, p < .01) perceived accessibility experience. No significant relationships with were observed for slope groups or parameters associated Black White groups. Practical implications use biodata theoretical research are discussed.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(33)
Lorrie A. Shepard, Gregory Camilli, Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items ,(1994)
Steven P. Reise, Susan E. Embretson, Item response theory for psychologists ,(2000)
Paul R. Sackett, Steffanie L. Wilk, Within-group norming and other forms of score adjustment in preemployment testing. American Psychologist. ,vol. 49, pp. 929- 954 ,(1994) , 10.1037/0003-066X.49.11.929
Janice Dowd Scheuneman, Kalle Gerritz, Using Differential Item Functioning Procedures to Explore Sources of Item Difficulty and Group Performance Characteristics. Journal of Educational Measurement. ,vol. 27, pp. 109- 131 ,(1990) , 10.1111/J.1745-3984.1990.TB00737.X
Lawrence R. James, Robert G. Demaree, Gerrit Wolf, Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology. ,vol. 69, pp. 85- 98 ,(1984) , 10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
Garnett S Stokes, Introduction to Special Issue: The Next One Hundred Years of Biodata Human Resource Management Review. ,vol. 9, pp. 111- 116 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00014-5
Mary Roznowski, Use of tests manifesting sex differences as measures of intelligence: Implications for measurement bias. Journal of Applied Psychology. ,vol. 72, pp. 480- 483 ,(1987) , 10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.480
Lyle F Schoenfeldt, From Dust Bowl Empiricism to Rational Constructs in Biographical Data Human Resource Management Review. ,vol. 9, pp. 147- 167 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00016-9
Michael D Mumford, Construct Validity and Background Data: Issues, Abuses, and Future Directions Human Resource Management Review. ,vol. 9, pp. 117- 145 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00015-7
Louis Roussos, William Stout, A multidimensionality-based DIF analysis paradigm Applied Psychological Measurement. ,vol. 20, pp. 355- 371 ,(1996) , 10.1177/014662169602000404