Unique insight into the seasonal variability of geophysical properties of field soils: practical implications for near-surface investigations

作者: Daniel Boddice , Nicole Metje , David Chapman

DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2017020

关键词:

摘要: Electromagnetic wave propagation methods are extensively used in geophysical prospecting, such as in archaeological and utility surveys. The signal penetration attenuation of electromagnetic waves depend strongly on the apparent permittivity electrical conductivity soil, which vary a seasonal basis, affecting detection buried features, especially their detected depth. However, there is a significant lack high-quality long-term seasonal field monitoring data electromagnetic properties different soil conditions to aid understanding how these properties field conditions. results reported this paper will contribute addressing scarcity data. Longterm data presented analysed from bespoke time-domain reflectometry stations designed enable collection relative dielectric permittivity, bulk conductivity, and temperature at high temporal resolution (hourly) three remote sites with soils over an extended period time (16–23 months). In addition providing extensive dataset, data highlight importance using accurate for prospecting. The greatest changes all near-surface soils (< 0.5 m), where many utilities generally found, rapid wetting events slower drying events greatly both conductivity. However, most critical factor determining water holding capacity, which, turn, function clay mineralogy content. An analysis ratio energy loss to storage shows that optimum ground penetrating radar surveying during the dry periods when low, displaying significance on survey outcomes due its effect conductivity. this paper survey planning, thereby ensuring better underground target rate.

参考文章(50)
A.A. Ponizovsky, S.M. Chudinova, Y.A. Pachepsky, Performance of TDR calibration models as affected by soil texture Journal of Hydrology. ,vol. 218, pp. 35- 43 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00017-7
Muhammad Mukhlisin, Almushfi Saputra, Performance evaluation of volumetric water content and relative permittivity models. The Scientific World Journal. ,vol. 2013, pp. 421762- 421762 ,(2013) , 10.1155/2013/421762
M. Menziani, S. Pugnaghi, S. Vincenzi, R. Santangelo, Soil moisture monitoring in the Toce valley (Italy) Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. ,vol. 7, pp. 890- 902 ,(2003) , 10.5194/HESS-7-890-2003
G. C. Topp, J. L. Davis, A. P. Annan, Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines Water Resources Research. ,vol. 16, pp. 574- 582 ,(1980) , 10.1029/WR016I003P00574
M. Bechtold, J.A. Huisman, L. Weihermüller, H. Vereecken, Accurate determination of the bulk electrical conductivity with the TDR100 cable tester. Soil Science Society of America Journal. ,vol. 74, pp. 495- 501 ,(2010) , 10.2136/SSSAJ2009.0247
Kirk W. Weiler, Tammo S. Steenhuis, Jan Boll, K.-J. Samuel Kung, Comparison of Ground Penetrating Radar and Time-Domain Reflectometry as Soil Water Sensors Soil Science Society of America Journal. ,vol. 62, pp. 1237- 1239 ,(1998) , 10.2136/SSSAJ1998.03615995006200050013X
Keith Beven, Robert E. Horton's perceptual model of infiltration processes Hydrological Processes. ,vol. 18, pp. 3447- 3460 ,(2004) , 10.1002/HYP.5740
D. A. Robinson, S. B. Jones, J. M. Wraith, D. Or, S. P. Friedman, A Review of Advances in Dielectric and Electrical Conductivity Measurement in Soils Using Time Domain Reflectometry Vadose Zone Journal. ,vol. 2, pp. 444- 475 ,(2003) , 10.2136/VZJ2003.4440
Marco Bittelli, Fiorenzo Salvatorelli, Paola Rossi Pisa, Correction of TDR-based soil water content measurements in conductive soils Geoderma. ,vol. 143, pp. 133- 142 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2007.10.022