Evaluation of Ordination Techniques

作者: Robert H. Whittaker , Hugh G. Gauch

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-7989-5_10

关键词:

摘要: Historically, ordination techniques have had a number of sources (Whittaker 1967), from early work in direct gradient analysis (articles 2 and 4) the use similarity measurements various schools 5 6) to development Wisconsin polar its modifications (article 7) introduction multivariate other fields 8 9) testing these new appropriate ecological data research purposes 10 11). The following article contains brief summary this history (11.2). combinations different approaches, algorithms, coefficients, criteria for axis determination provide an uncountable possible techniques. Summarization range evaluation their usefulness natural communities are needed. We consider here how affected by peculiarities community data, they can be evaluated, what recommendations on offered.

参考文章(130)
R. H. Whittaker, W. A. Niering, Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: A Gradient Analysis of the South Slope Ecology. ,vol. 46, pp. 429- 452 ,(1965) , 10.2307/1934875
R. H. Whittaker, S. A. Levin, R. B. Root, Niche, Habitat, and Ecotope The American Naturalist. ,vol. 107, pp. 321- 338 ,(1973) , 10.1086/282837
Stephen R. Kessell, Robert H. Whittaker, Comparisons of three ordination techniques Vegetatio. ,vol. 32, pp. 21- 29 ,(1976) , 10.1007/BF02094661
I. Frydman, R. H. Whittaker, Forest Associations of Southeast Lublin Province, Poland Ecology. ,vol. 49, pp. 896- 908 ,(1968) , 10.2307/1936541
Hugh G. Gauch, The Relationship Between Sample Similarity and Ecological Distance Ecology. ,vol. 54, pp. 618- 622 ,(1973) , 10.2307/1935348
Walter E. Westman, Edaphic Climax Pattern of the Pygmy Forest Region of California Ecological Monographs. ,vol. 45, pp. 109- 135 ,(1975) , 10.2307/1942403
H. G. Gauch, T. R. Wentworth, Canonical correlation analysis as an ordination technique Vegetatio. ,vol. 33, pp. 17- 22 ,(1976) , 10.1007/BF00055295
F. G. Goff, G. Cottam, Gradient Analysis: The Use of Species and Synthetic Indices Ecology. ,vol. 49, pp. 185- 185 ,(1968) , 10.2307/1933582