Rivalry and Uncertainty in Complementary Investments with Dynamic Market Sharing

作者: Alcino Azevedo , Dean Paxson

DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2580544

关键词:

摘要: We study the combined effects of revenue and cost uncertainty as well competition on timing optimization investments in complementarity inputs for duopoly markets where either spillover-knowledge is allowed or proprietary-knowledge holds. For some input-sequencing investment scenarios, we find that ex-ante ex-post market shares play an important role firms behaviour. When about input costs are considered together with competition, conventional wisdom which says “when a production process requires two extremely complementary should upgrade (or replace) them simultaneously,” does not necessarily hold, particularly follower. Some illustrated results show nonlinear complex criteria both firms.

参考文章(38)
Frank Rafae< Smets, Essays on foreign direct investment UMI. ,(1999)
Margaret Y. Hwang, David Weil, David Weil, Ratcheting Up: Linked Technology Adoption in Supply Chains Social Science Research Network. ,(2005)
Chi Man Leung, Yue Kuen Kwok, Patent-Investment Games Under Asymmetric Information Social Science Research Network. ,(2010) , 10.2139/SSRN.1620349
Michele Moretto, Competition and Irreversible Investments under Uncertainty Social Science Research Network. ,(2003) , 10.2139/SSRN.406401
Benoit Chevalier-Roignant, Christoph M. Flath, Arnd Huchzermeier, Lenos Trigeorgis, Strategic Investment under Uncertainty: A Synthesis Social Science Research Network. ,(2010) , 10.2139/SSRN.1543763
Alcino Azevedo, Dean Paxson, Developing Real Option Game Models Social Science Research Network. ,(2014) , 10.2139/SSRN.2268102
Martin A. Carree, Boris Lokshin, René Belderbos, A Note on Testing for Complementarity and Substitutability in the Case of Multiple Practices Social Science Research Network. ,(2011)
t H. Smith, Uncertainty and the adoption of complementary technologies Social Science Research Network. ,(2005)
Erin Anderson, David C. Schmittlein, Integration of the sales force: an empirical examination The RAND Journal of Economics. ,vol. 15, pp. 385- 395 ,(1984) , 10.2307/2555446