NATO Burden Sharing in Libya A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

作者: Tim Haesebrouck

DOI: 10.1177/0022002715626248

关键词:

摘要: This study aims to explain the pattern of contributions NATO’s military campaign in Libya. It combines collective action theory with hypotheses on balance threat, alliance politics, and domestic constraints a multicausal framework, which is tested qualitative comparative analysis. The results suggest novel inferences interactions between partisan benefits states wish secure by contributing multilateral operation. Contrary conventional wisdom, parties situated at left ideological spectrum were more inclined support Operation Unified Protector than right. Whereas left-wing governments participated if they had resources contribute significantly fulfillment protection mandate either highly valued their United States or not facing imminent elections, right-wing only contributed countries’ interests threatened crisis Libya participat...

参考文章(61)
Rachel A. Dicke, Ryan C. Hendrickson, Phillip A. Roughton, Nicholas Anson, NATO Burden-Sharing in Libya: Understanding the Contributions of Norway, Spain and Poland to the War Effort1 The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs. ,vol. 22, pp. 29- ,(2013)
Michela Ceccorulli, Fabrizio Coticchia, None, Multidimensional Threats and Military Engagement: The Case of the Italian Intervention in Libya Mediterranean Politics. ,vol. 20, pp. 303- 321 ,(2015) , 10.1080/13629395.2015.1042245
Jeffrey H Michaels, NATO After Libya RUSI Journal. ,vol. 156, pp. 56- 61 ,(2011) , 10.1080/03071847.2011.642689
Stephen M. Saideman, David P. Auerswald, Comparing Caveats: Understanding the Sources of National Restrictions upon NATO's Mission in Afghanistan International Studies Quarterly. ,vol. 56, pp. 67- 84 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1468-2478.2011.00700.X