A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache

作者: Jeffrey L. Jackson , Elizabeth Cogbill , Rafael Santana-Davila , Christina Eldredge , William Collier

DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0130733

关键词:

摘要: Objective To compare the effectiveness and side effects of migraine prophylactic medications. Design We performed a network meta-analysis. Data were extracted independently in duplicate quality was assessed using both JADAD Cochrane Risk Bias instruments. pooled meta-analysis random models. Sources PUBMED, EMBASE, Trial Registry, bibliography retrieved articles through 18 May 2014. Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies included randomized controlled trials adults with headaches at least 4 weeks duration. Results Placebo alpha blockers (n = 9), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors 3), receptor anticonvulsants 32), beta-blockers 39), calcium channel 12), flunarizine 7), serotonin reuptake 6), norepinephrine 1) agonists 9) tricyclic antidepressants 11). In addition there 53 comparing different drugs. Drugs 3 that more effective than placebo episodic migraines amitriptyline (SMD: -1.2, 95% CI: -1.7 to -0.82), -flunarizine (-1.1 headaches/month (ha/month), -1.6 -0.67), fluoxetine -0.57, -0.97 -0.17), metoprolol (-0.94 ha/month, -1.4 -0.46), pizotifen (-0.43 -0.6 -0.21), propranolol (-1.3 -2.0 -0.62), topiramate -1.9 -0.73) valproate (-1.5 -2.1 -0.8). Several drugs less included: ace (enalapril, lisinopril, captopril), two (candesartan, telmisartan), (lamotrigine, levetiracetam), several (atenolol, bisoprolol, timolol). Network found be better other medications including candesartan, fluoxetine, propranolol, no atenolol, flunarizine, clomipramine or metoprolol. Conclusion good evidence supporting efficacy. There is weak amitriptyline’s superiority over some Selection medication should tailored according patient preferences, characteristics effect profiles.

参考文章(241)
Rompel H, Bauermeister Pw, Aetiology of migraine and prevention with carbamazepine (Tegretol): results of a double-blind, cross-over study. South African Medical Journal. ,vol. 44, pp. 75- 80 ,(1970)
Syeda Zain, Rafique Alam, Shakil Ahmed, Irfan Zafar, Moosa Khan, Comparison of efficacy and safety of topiramate with gabapentin in migraine prophylaxis: randomized open label control trial. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. ,vol. 63, pp. 3- 7 ,(2013)
Korenko La, Amelin Av, Tumelevich BCh, Gonchar Ma, Skoromets Aa, [A comparative efficiency of amitriptyline, fluoxetine and maprotiline in prevention of migraine in attack-free period]. Zhurnal Nevrologii I Psikhiatrii Imeni S S Korsakova. ,vol. 100, pp. 20- ,(2000)
M.J. Gawel, J. Kreeft, R.F. Nelson, D. Simard, W.S. Arnott, Comparison of the efficacy and safety of flunarizine to propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. ,vol. 19, pp. 340- 345 ,(1992) , 10.1017/S0317167100041962
Morris Levin, Jes Olesen, Classification of Headache Springer Milan. pp. 157- 179 ,(2011) , 10.1007/978-88-470-1700-9_11
I Polychronidis, D D Mitsikostas, Valproate versus flunarizine in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized, double-open, clinical trial. Functional Neurology. ,vol. 12, pp. 267- 276 ,(1997)
J E Sutherland, J E Kruse, R C Bredfeldt, Efficacy of transdermal clonidine for headache prophylaxis and reduction of narcotic use in migraine patients. A randomized crossover trial. Journal of Family Practice. ,vol. 29, pp. 153- 158 ,(1989)
Noone Jf, Clomipramine in the prevention of migraine. Journal of International Medical Research. pp. 49- 52 ,(1980)
Freitag Fg, Diamond S, Nadolol and placebo comparison study in the prophylactic treatment of migraine. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. ,vol. 84, pp. 343- 343 ,(1984) , 10.7556/JAOA.1984.84.4.343