Expert critics in engineering design: lessons learned and research needs

作者: Toufic M. Mezher , Barry G. Silverman

DOI: 10.1609/AIMAG.V13I1.977

关键词:

摘要: An engineer who creates a design needs to determine whether the is free of errors that can lead high manufacturing costs, tragic accidents because defects, low use poor product quality, and host other downstream concerns. The domain engineering much harder than domains, are more likely arise remain undetected until it too late do something about them. One way reduce these introduce expert critics into designer's electronic support environment. Critics promising approach for organizing next-generation environment (DSE). Unfortunately, expert-critiquing theory offers inaccurate but widely followed guidance helping builders create usable critic programs. Existing rely on batch, after-task, debiasing experts. This form criticism turns out be overly limited often leads user frustration. As step toward correcting this deficiency, article presents lessons learned from following incorrect along with robust system construction. Future research also identified should help realize full potential in DSEs.

参考文章(21)
Mark John. Jakiela, Intelligent suggestive CAD systems ,(1988)
Barry G. Silverman, Criticism-Based Knowledge Acquisition for Document Generation innovative applications of artificial intelligence. pp. 291- 319 ,(1991)
Frederick Hayes-Roth, Donald A. Waterman, Douglas B. Lenat, Building expert systems ,(1983)
R.L. Spickelmier, A.R. Newton, Critic: a knowledge-based program for critiquing circuit designs Proceedings 1988 IEEE International Conference on Computer Design: VLSI. pp. 324- 327 ,(1988) , 10.1109/ICCD.1988.25715
Perry L. Miller, ATTENDING: Critiquing a Physician's Management Plan IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. ,vol. PAMI-5, pp. 449- 461 ,(1983) , 10.1109/TPAMI.1983.4767424
Barry Silverman, Human-computer collaboration Human-Computer Interaction. ,vol. 7, pp. 165- 196 ,(1992) , 10.1207/S15327051HCI0702_2