Reliability of radiographic evaluation for acromial morphology

作者: Adam S. Bright , Brian Torpey , D. Magid , Timothy Codd , Edward G. McFarland

DOI: 10.1007/S002560050317

关键词:

摘要: Objetive. Bigliani’s classification system of acromial morphology utilizing the standard outlet radiograph has become in accepted method for evaluating patients with rotator cuff disease. This study evaluates interobserver and intraobserver reliability using observers at various levels training. Patients design. Supraspinatus view radiographs 40 (aged 18–78 years) shoulder pain were reviewed twice, 4 months apart, a masked protocol by six reviewers, including two attending (fellowship-trained) surgeons, an musculoskeletal radiologist, orthopedic surgery sports fellow, residents (PGY-2 PGY-5). The reviewers given diagrams Bigliani asked to classify each film as type I, II, or III acromion. Interobserver repeatability values calculated kappa statistic analysis (0–0.2 slight, 0.21–0.4 fair, 0.41–0.6 moderate, 0.61–0.8 substantial, 0.8–1.0 excellent). Results conclusion. For readings, all agreed only 18% time. Kappa pairwise comparison among ranged from 0.01 0.75 (mean 0.35), 0.26 (PGY-5 resident) 0.80 (fellowship-trained surgeon), mean 0.55. Intraobserver was not significantly different expertise. More definitive criteria are needed distinguish

参考文章(19)
NO Thomsen, S Overgaard, LH Olsen, H Hansen, ST Nielsen, Observer variation in the radiographic classification of ankle fractures Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume. ,vol. 73, pp. 676- 678 ,(1991) , 10.1302/0301-620X.73B4.2071659
RF Kilcoyne, PK Reddy, F Lyons, CA Rockwood, Optimal plain film imaging of the shoulder impingement syndrome American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 153, pp. 795- 797 ,(1989) , 10.2214/AJR.153.4.795
Scott R. Jacobson, Kevin P. Speer, John T. Moor, David H. Janda, Stephen R. Saddemi, Peter B. MacDonald, William J. Mallon, Reliability of radiographic assessment of acromial morphology. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. ,vol. 4, pp. 449- 453 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S1058-2746(05)80037-0
E. Van Holsbeeck, J. DeRycke, G. Declercq, M. Martens, J. Verstreken, G. Fabry, Subacromial impingement: Open versus arthroscopic decompression Arthroscopy. ,vol. 8, pp. 173- 178 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0749-8063(92)90032-7
Bjarne Kristiansen, Ulrich L. S. Andersen, Claus A. Olsen, Jens-Erik Varmarken, The Neer classification of fractures of the proximal humerus. An assessment of interobserver variation. Skeletal Radiology. ,vol. 17, pp. 420- 422 ,(1988) , 10.1007/BF00361661
W C Peh, T H Farmer, W G Totty, Acromial arch shape: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology. ,vol. 195, pp. 501- 505 ,(1995) , 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.195.2.7724774
JAN-MAGNUS BJ??RKENHEIM, PEKKA PAAVOLAINEN, JUHANI AHOVUO, P??R SL??TIS, Subacromial impingement decompressed with anterior acromioplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. pp. 150- 155 ,(1990) , 10.1097/00003086-199003000-00022
JAMES R. ANDREWS, J. W. THOMAS BYRD, SETH P. KUPFERMAN, RICHARD L. ANGELO, The profile view of the acromion. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. ,vol. 263, pp. 142- 146 ,(1991) , 10.1097/00003086-199102000-00016