Evolutionary and Developmental Formation: Politics of the Boundary

作者: Susan Oyama

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-03825-3_5

关键词:

摘要: Much of my work has been concerned with what we could call the politics boundary. The meaning “politics” here is very broad, having to do all sorts influence and power, but especially power define privilege, include exclude, render central or peripheral. Though this may involve matters “outside” science (a fraught frontier if ever there was one) it need not. Some reasons for working on nature-nurture problem stem from concerns about publicly contested issues of, say, intelligence, race sex, most have kinds distinctions that are made in scientific draws feeds these larger disputes. Any theory carves world particular ways so legitimates some entities while leaving others beyond pale--secondary, invisible unintelligible.

参考文章(49)
Bruce H. Weber, David J. Depew, Does the Second Law of Thermodynamics Refute the Neo-Darwinian Synthesis? Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 50- 75 ,(1999) , 10.1007/978-3-662-03825-3_4
Lenny Moss, A Kernel of Truth? On the Reality of the Genetic Program PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. ,vol. 1992, pp. 335- 348 ,(1992) , 10.1086/PSAPROCBIENMEETP.1992.1.192766
Susan Oyama, A Reformulation of the Idea of Maturation Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 101- 131 ,(1982) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-7578-8_2
Evelyn Fox Keller, Secrets of life, secrets of death ,(1992)
David Hull, Science as a process ,(1988)
Susan. Oyama, The ontogeny of information Duke University Press,. ,(2000)
P. E. Griffiths, R. D. Gray, , Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation The Journal of Philosophy. ,vol. 91, pp. 277- 304 ,(1994) , 10.2307/2940982
Death of the gene: developmental systems strike back Conference on Philosophical Problems in Evolutionary Biology. pp. 165- 209 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-94-015-8038-0