Sociodemographic Differences in Early Access to Liver Transplantation Services

作者: C. L. Bryce , D. C. Angus , R. M. Arnold , C.-C. H. Chang , M. H. Farrell

DOI: 10.1111/J.1600-6143.2009.02737.X

关键词:

摘要: The question of whether health care inequities occur before patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) are waitlisted for transplantation has not previously been assessed. To determine the impact gender, race and insurance on access to transplantation, we linked Pennsylvania sources data regarding adult discharged from nongovernmental hospitals 1994 2001. We followed through 2003 information records five centers responsible 95% transplants in during this period. Using multinomial logistic regressions, estimated probabilities that would undergo transplant evaluation, waitlisting itself. Of 144,507 study, 4361 (3.0%) underwent evaluation. those evaluated, 3071 (70.4%) were waitlisted. waitlisted, 1537 (50.0%) received a transplant. Overall, 57,020 (39.5%) died study Patients less likely if they women, black lacked commercial (p < 0.001 each). Differences more pronounced early stages (evaluation listing) than stage (in which national oversight review occur). For management treatment decisions ESLD be better understood, comprehensive concerning referral listing practices needed.

参考文章(19)
Venodhar R. Julapalli, Jennifer R. Kramer, Hashem B. El-Serag, Evaluation for liver transplantation: adherence to AASLD referral guidelines in a large Veterans Affairs center. Liver Transplantation. ,vol. 11, pp. 1370- 1378 ,(2005) , 10.1002/LT.20434
Janet E. Tuttle-Newhall, Robert Rutledge, Mark Johnson, Jeff Fair, A statewide, population-based, time series analysis of access to liver transplantation. Transplantation. ,vol. 63, pp. 255- 262 ,(1997) , 10.1097/00007890-199701270-00014
Devin E. Eckhoff, Brendan M. McGuire, Carlton J. Young, Marty T. Sellers, Luc R. Frenette, Sharon L. Hudson, Juan L. Contreras, Stevenson Bynon, Race: A critical factor in organ donation, patient referral and selection, and orthotopic liver transplantation? Liver Transplantation. ,vol. 4, pp. 499- 505 ,(1998) , 10.1002/LT.500040606
Stefanos A Zenios, Lawrence M Wein, Glenn M Chertow, Evidence-based organ allocation∗∗Access the “Journal Club” discussion of this paper at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ajmselect/ The American Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 107, pp. 52- 61 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00166-7
Peter A. Ubel, George Loewenstein, Public perceptions of the importance of prognosis in allocating transplantable livers to children. Medical Decision Making. ,vol. 16, pp. 234- 241 ,(1996) , 10.1177/0272989X9601600307
T. Randall, Criteria for evaluating potential transplant recipients vary among centers, physicians JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 269, pp. 3091b- 3091 ,(1993) , 10.1001/JAMA.269.24.3091B
Rachel Ankeny Majeske, Transforming objectivity to promote equity in transplant candidate selection Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. ,vol. 17, pp. 45- 59 ,(1996) , 10.1007/BF00489740
Edgar L. Milford, ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION-BARRIERS, OUTCOMES, AND EVOLVING POLICIES JAMA. ,vol. 280, pp. 1184- 1185 ,(1998) , 10.1001/JAMA.280.13.1184