Effectiveness of modifying existing fences to deter deer and elk from crops and high-value pastures

作者: Randy Lee. Fenster

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Big game can damage crops and compete with livestock for valuable forage. Ranchers have reported their tolerance big would increase if the animals could be prevented from using key areas critical use. Likewise, some farmers high value that must protected. Fences provide most consistent long term control compared to other deterrent methods, but are costly erect. Traditional complete construction of fences cost more than $9,000 per kilometer materials. Costs erecting deer proof fencing greatly reduced an existing fence is modified instead being replaced entirely. The objective this study was investigate possibility modifying prohibit (Odocoileus spp.) elk (Cervus elaphus) crossings. Forty exclosures were constructed test 4 different modifications across southwest Montana. Exclosures baited monitored two winters determine how well they detered ungulate Results indicate effective made $827 $2187 Different designs proved varying levels effectiveness, 1.8 m woven wire 100% effective. These a cost-effective way out wildlife in many high-value where traditional not practical. If ranchers keep important foraging areas, these on rest property may as depredation losses decrease.

参考文章(25)
John R. Lacey, Keith Jamtgaard, Lex Riggle, Tiffany Hayes, Impacts of Big Game on Private Land in South-Western Montana: Landowner Perceptions Journal of Range Management. ,vol. 46, pp. 31- 37 ,(1993) , 10.2307/4002444
John A. Bissonette, Mark E. Lehnert, Effectiveness of Highway Crosswalk Structures at Reducing Deer-Vehicle Collisions Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 25, pp. 809- 818 ,(1997)
J.L. Belant, T.W. Seamans, C.P. Dwyer, Evaluation of propane exploders as white-tailed deer deterrents Crop Protection. ,vol. 15, pp. 575- 578 ,(1996) , 10.1016/0261-2194(96)00027-0
P.J Goddard, R.W Summers, A.J Macdonald, C Murray, A.R Fawcett, Behavioural responses of red deer to fences of five different designs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. ,vol. 73, pp. 289- 298 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00150-2
William F. Andelt, Dan L. Baker, Kenneth P. Burnham, RELATIVE PREFERENCE OF CAPTIVE COW ELK FOR REPELLENT-TREATED DIETS Journal of Wildlife Management. ,vol. 56, pp. 164- 173 ,(1992) , 10.2307/3808805
George R Gallagher, Robert H Prince, Negative operant conditioning fails to deter white-tailed deer foraging activity Crop Protection. ,vol. 22, pp. 893- 895 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0261-2194(03)00048-6
THOMAS W. SEAMANS, KURT C. VERCAUTEREN, Evaluation of ElectroBraid™ Fencing as a White-Tailed Deer Barrier Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 34, pp. 8- 15 ,(2006) , 10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[8:EOEFAA]2.0.CO;2
M. E. Nelson, L. D. Mech, Dispersal in Female White-Tailed Deer Journal of Mammalogy. ,vol. 73, pp. 891- 894 ,(1992) , 10.2307/1382212
L. K. Halls, C. E. Boyd, D. W. Lay, P. D. Goodrum, Deer Fence Construction and Costs Journal of Wildlife Management. ,vol. 29, pp. 885- 888 ,(1965) , 10.2307/3798569
William F. Andelt, Kenneth P. Burnham, Dan L. Baker, Effectiveness of capsaicin and bitrex repellents for deterring browsing by captive mule deer Journal of Wildlife Management. ,vol. 58, pp. 330- 334 ,(1994) , 10.2307/3809398