How many specimens do I need? Sampling error in geometric morphometrics: testing the sensitivity of means and variances in simple randomized selection experiments

作者: Andrea Cardini , Krish Seetah , Graeme Barker

DOI: 10.1007/S00435-015-0253-Z

关键词:

摘要: One of the most basic but problematic issues in modern morphometrics is how many specimens one needs to achieve accuracy samples. Indeed, this regularly posed questions introductory courses. There no simple and certainly absolute answer question. However, there are a number techniques for exploring effect sampling, our aim provide an example might function simplified informative way. Thus, using resampling methods sensitivity analyses based on randomized subsamples, we assessed sampling error horse teeth from several fossil populations. Centroid size shape upper premolar (PM2) were captured Procrustes geometric morphometrics. Means variances (using three different statistics variance) estimated, as well their confidence intervals. Also, largest population sample was randomly split into progressively smaller subsamples assess reducing affects statistical parameters. Results indicate that mean centroid highly accurate; even when small, errors generally considerably than differences among In contrast, estimation requires large samples tens (ca. >20), although requirement may be less stringent variance very small (e.g. populations underwent strong genetic bottlenecks). Variance either or can inaccurate samples, point makes it variable spatially chronologically well-separated populations, including two which distinctive consequence artificial selection. Likely, require <15–20 reasonable degree accuracy. analysis largely congruent with pattern suggested by bootstrapped intervals, observations previous study African monkeys. The performed, especially assessment, do not much time computational effort; however, they necessitate at least (50 more specimens). If type became common morphometrics, could effective tool preliminarily exploration results therefore assist assessing robustness. Finally, use studies increases, present case form part set examples allow us better understand estimate what desirable be, depending scientific question, data taxonomic level under investigation.

参考文章(49)
Miriam L. Zelditch, H. David Sheets, Studying ontogenetic trajectories using resampling methods and landmark data Hystrix-italian Journal of Mammalogy. ,vol. 24, pp. 67- 73 ,(2013) , 10.4404/HYSTRIX-24.1-6332
Jean-Christophe Auffray, Sabrina Renaud, The direction of main phenotypic variance as a channel to evolution: cases in murine rodents Hystrix-italian Journal of Mammalogy. ,vol. 24, pp. 85- 93 ,(2013) , 10.4404/HYSTRIX-24.1-6296
Sanford Weisberg, John Fox, An R Companion to Applied Regression ,(2010)
Leandro Rabello Monteiro, Morphometrics and the comparative method: studying the evolution of biological shape Hystrix-italian Journal of Mammalogy. ,vol. 24, pp. 25- 32 ,(2013) , 10.4404/HYSTRIX-24.1-6282
Alistair Robert Evans, Shape descriptors as ecometrics in dental ecology Hystrix-italian Journal of Mammalogy. ,vol. 24, pp. 133- 140 ,(2013) , 10.4404/HYSTRIX-24.1-6363
Bradley Efron, Thomas J. DiCiccio, Bootstrap Confidence Intervals Statistical Science. ,vol. 11, pp. 189- 228 ,(1996) , 10.1214/SS/1032280214
Miriam Zelditch, Donald Swiderski, H David Sheets, None, Geometric morphometrics for biologists : a primer Elsevier Academic Press. ,(2004)
David C. Howell, Statistical Methods for Psychology ,(1987)