Projection in surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments.

作者: Angela Fagerlin , Peter H. Ditto , Joseph H. Danks , Renate M. Houts

DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.20.3.166

关键词:

摘要: To honor the wishes of an incapacitated patient, surrogate decision makers must predict treatment decisions patients would make for themselves if able. Social psychological research, however, suggests that surrogates' own preferences may influence their predictions others' preferences. In 2 studies (1 involving 60 college student surrogates and a parent, other 361 elderly outpatients chosen maker), predicted whether close want life-sustaining in hypothetical end-of-life scenarios stated same scenarios. Surrogate more closely resembled than they did individual were trying to predict. Although majority prediction errors reflected inaccurate use preferences, projection was also found result accurate often counterprojective predictions. The rationality accuracy making is discussed.

参考文章(44)
Holly Teetzel, Robert A. Pearlman, Robert M. Kaplan, Lawrence J. Schneiderman, Do physicians' own preferences for life-sustaining treatment influence their perceptions of patients' preferences? Journal of Clinical Ethics. ,vol. 4, pp. 28- 33 ,(1993)
R F Uhlmann, R A Pearlman, K C Cain, Understanding of elderly patients' resuscitation preferences by physicians and nurses. Western Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 150, pp. 705- 707 ,(1989)
Hillel J Einhorn, None, Insights in decision making : a tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn University of Chicago Press. ,(1990)
Joachim Krueger, On the Perception of Social Consensus Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 30, pp. 163- 240 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60384-6
Brian Mullen, Jennifer L Atkins, Debbie S Champion, Cecelia Edwards, Dana Hardy, John E Story, Mary Vanderklok, The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 21, pp. 262- 283 ,(1985) , 10.1016/0022-1031(85)90020-4
Allison B. Seckler, Substituted Judgment: How Accurate Are Proxy Predictions? Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 115, pp. 92- 98 ,(1991) , 10.7326/0003-4819-115-2-92
David C. Funder, Melinda C. Blackman, David C. Kolar, Agreement among judges of personality: interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 69, pp. 656- 672 ,(1995) , 10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.656
Stephen J. Hoch, Perceived consensus and predictive accuracy: The pros and cons of projection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 53, pp. 221- 234 ,(1987) , 10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.221
Mark H. Davis, Amy Smith, Laura Conklin, Carol Luce, Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 70, pp. 713- 726 ,(1996) , 10.1037//0022-3514.70.4.713