The environmental impacts of the production of concentrated feed: the case of pig feed in Bretagne

作者: Hayo M.G. van der Werf , Jean Petit , Joost Sanders

DOI: 10.1016/J.AGSY.2004.03.005

关键词:

摘要: Pig production systems often depend to a large extent on concentrated feed imported from outside the farm. This study used Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method assess major environmental impacts associated with and on-farm delivery of for pigs. Feed composition was based average data Bretagne (France) in 1998 published wheat-based, maize-based co-product feeds. As crop practices are similar those most western Europe, we conclude that results this apply more largely Europe. Depending fertilisation practise crop-based ingredients, one kg finishing pigs will produce eutrophication potential between 3.8 9.3 g PO4-equivalents, global warming 472 792 CO2-equivalents, an acidification 3.0 6.3 SO2-equivalents, terrestrial ecotoxicity 0.4 8.7 1,4-dichlorobenzene-equivalents, energy use 3.3 6.1 MJ, land 1.44 2.07 m2 year. These mainly due ingredients. The contribution transport processes substantial climate change, use. A containing co-products had higher lower than feeds consisting non-processed Hypotheses respect feed's main ingredients have effect its impact values. uncertainty concerning emissions N2O, NH3, NO3 very eutrophication. burdens pig can be decreased by: optimising using locally produced reducing concentrations Cu Zn feed, wheat-based rather

参考文章(23)
Arvin Mosier, Carolien Kroeze, Cindy Nevison, Oene Oenema, Sybil Seitzinger, Oswald van Cleemput, Closing the global N2O budget: nitrous oxide emissions through the agricultural nitrogen cycle Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. ,vol. 52, pp. 225- 248 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1009740530221
Onna M.J.G. Meeusen-van, Sleeswijk A. Wegener, H.H.W.J.M. Sengers, H. Leneman, J.A.W.A. Reus, van H. Zeijts, R. Kleijn, Application of LCA to agricultural products : 1. Core methodological issues; 2. Supplement to the LCA guide; 3. Methodological background Centre of Environmental Science, CLM, LEI-DLO. ,(1996)
B. A. Callander, L. G. Meira Filho, John Theodore Houghton, K. Maskell, A. Kattenberg, N. Harris, Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change ,(1996)
Mark AJ Huijbregts, U Thissen, JB Guinée, T Jager, D Kalf, D Van de Meent, AMJ Ragas, A Wegener Sleeswijk, L Reijnders, None, Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. Part I: Calculation of toxicity potentials for 181 substances with the nested multi-media fate, exposure and effects model USES–LCA Chemosphere. ,vol. 41, pp. 541- 573 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00030-8
Hans-Erik Uhlin, Why energy productivity is increasing: An I-O analysis of Swedish agriculture Agricultural Systems. ,vol. 56, pp. 443- 465 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00059-0
Sven -Olof Ryding, ISO 14042 Environmental management • Life cycle assessment • life cycle impact assessment International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 4, pp. 307- 307 ,(1999) , 10.1007/BF02978514
C. R. W. Spedding, An introduction to agricultural systems ,(1988)
John William Purseglove, Tropical crops: monocotyledons ,(1972)
Helias A. Udo de Haes, Olivier Jolliet, Göran Finnveden, Michael Hauschild, Wolfram Krewitt, Ruedi Müller-Wenk, Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 4, pp. 66- 74 ,(1999) , 10.1007/BF02979403
B. Mary, N. Beaudoin, E. Justes, J. M. Machet, Calculation of nitrogen mineralization and leaching in fallow soil using a simple dynamic model European Journal of Soil Science. ,vol. 50, pp. 549- 566 ,(1999) , 10.1046/J.1365-2389.1999.00264.X