Refusal and resistance to care by people living with dementia being cared for within acute hospital wards: an ethnographic study

作者: Katie Featherstone , Andy Northcott , Jane Harden , Karen Harrison Denning , Rosie Tope

DOI: 10.3310/HSDR07110

关键词:

摘要: Background The acute hospital setting has become a key site of care for people living with dementia. Department Health and Social Care recognises that as many one in four beds the UK will be occupied by person dementia at any given time. However, are highly vulnerable group within setting. Following an admission, their functional abilities can deteriorate quickly significantly. Detailed research is required to understand role needs health-care staff caring this patient population explore what constitutes ‘good care’ Objectives focus study was common but poorly understood phenomenon setting: refusal resistance care. Our questions were ‘How do ward respond everyday being cared on wards?’ ‘What perspective patients carers?’. Design This ethnography informed symbolic interactionist tradition, focusing understanding how action meaning constructed In-depth evidence-based analysis enabled us responded follow consequences actions. Setting carried out 155 days (over 18 months) 10 wards five hospitals across England Wales, which purposefully selected represent range types, geographies socioeconomic catchments. Participants In addition general observations, participants took part directly study, contributing 436 ethnographic interviews. Ten detailed case studies also undertaken Results We identified high levels among wards. Every observed resisted some point during admission. Limitations included potential Hawthorne or researcher effect influence data collection establishing generalisability findings. Conclusions Ward typically interpreted feature diagnosis, overshadowed person. response organisation delivery rational person’s present ontology perceptions. response, nurses assistants used multiple interactional approaches combined repetitive language completing essential body, itself had containment restraint bed bedside. These trigger resistance, creating cycles stress patients, families staff. findings have development simple, no-cost innovations organisational level. A further examining continence settings. Funding National Institute Research Services Delivery programme.

参考文章(134)
J Green, Commentary: grounded theory and the constant comparative method. BMJ. ,vol. 316, pp. 1064- 1065 ,(1998)
Darci Lynn Sturtz Becker, Patient awareness of dysphagia The University of Iowa. ,(2011) , 10.17077/ETD.31DXSL7L
Elizabeth Morrow, Glenn Robert, Jill Maben, Peter Griffiths, Implementing large-scale quality improvement: lessons from The Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. ,vol. 25, pp. 237- 253 ,(2012) , 10.1108/09526861211221464
John Keady, Lesley Jones, Investigating the causes of behaviours that challenge in people with dementia Nursing Older People. ,vol. 22, pp. 25- 29 ,(2010) , 10.7748/NOP2010.11.22.9.25.C8061
Juliet M. Corbin, Anselm Strauss, Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons and Evaluative Criteria Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie. ,vol. 19, pp. 418- 427 ,(1990) , 10.1007/BF00988593
Victoria Traynor, Kumiyo Inoue, Patrick Crookes, Literature review: understanding nursing competence in dementia care Journal of Clinical Nursing. ,vol. 20, pp. 1948- 1960 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1365-2702.2010.03511.X
C. Pinkert, B. Holle, Menschen mit Demenz im Akutkrankenhaus Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie. ,vol. 45, pp. 728- 734 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S00391-012-0319-1