Kinetic and Structural Evolution of Self-gravitating, Magnetized Clouds: 2.5-Dimensional Simulations of Decaying Turbulence

作者: Eve Charis Ostriker , Charles F. Gammie , Charles F. Gammie , James McLellan Stone

DOI: 10.1086/306842

关键词:

摘要: The molecular component of the Galaxy is comprised turbulent, magnetized clouds, many which are self-gravitating and form stars. To develop an understanding how these clouds' kinetic structural evolution may depend on their level turbulence, mean magnetization, degree self-gravity, we perform a survey direct numerical MHD simulations in three parameters independently varied. Our consist solutions to time-dependent equations two-dimensional grid with periodic boundary conditions; additional "half" dimension also incorporated as dependent variables third Cartesian direction. Two our parameters, magnetization parameter β≡c2sound/v2Alfven Jeans number nJ≡Lcloud/LJeans, allow us model clouds that either meet or fail conditions for magneto-Jeans stability magnetic criticality. parameter, sonic Mach ≡σvelocity/csound, allows initiate turbulence sub- super-Alfvenic amplitude; employ isothermal equation state throughout. We evaluate times each cloud become gravitationally bound measure model's energy loss over fluid-flow crossing time. compare density field morphology quantify differences contrast generated by internal stresses models differing magnetization. find values β nJ, but not initial , determine time gravitational binding collapse: nH2=100 cm-3, unmagnetized collapse after ~5 Myr, magnetically supercritical generally 5-10 Myr (although smallest stable survive until t~15 Myr), while subcritical remain uncollapsed entire simulations; scale tg∝n−½H2. find, contrary some previous expectations, less than factor 2 difference between turbulent decay varying strength; maximum time, B~14 μG 1.4 flow tcross=L/σvelocity (or 8 typical giant parameters). In all amplification strength up at least βpert≡c2sound/δv2Alfven=0.1, 25% 60% one non-self-gravitating stages evolution, when have =5-10, mass-averaged magnitudes log(ρ/) range 0.2-0.5, increasing both toward low high β. Although conclusions about statistics be affected assumption, note only more strongly appear consistent estimates clump/interclump contrasts inferred Galactic clouds.

参考文章(49)
Eve C. Ostriker, Turbulence and magnetic fields in star formation The seventh astrophysical conference: Star formation, near and far. ,vol. 393, pp. 51- 62 ,(2008) , 10.1063/1.52734
Adriaan Blaauw, OB Associations and the Fossil Record of Star Formation ASIC. ,vol. 342, pp. 125- 154 ,(1991) , 10.1007/978-94-011-3642-6_4
T. M. O'Neil, David Lincoln Book, Nonlinear Plasma Theory Nonlinear Plasma Theory. ,(1969)
Paolo Padoan, Åke Nordlund, Bernard J. T. Jones, A physical model for the stellar IMF The seventh astrophysical conference: Star formation, near and far. ,vol. 393, pp. 101- 104 ,(1997) , 10.1063/1.52773
Paul F. Goldsmith, Molecular Clouds: An Overview Interstellar Processes. ,vol. 134, pp. 51- 70 ,(1987) , 10.1007/978-94-009-3861-8_3
R. B. Larson, Turbulence and star formation in molecular clouds Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. ,vol. 194, pp. 809- 826 ,(1981) , 10.1093/MNRAS/194.4.809
Alyssa A. Goodman, Terry J. Jones, Elizabeth A. Lada, Philip C. Myers, Does near-infrared polarimetry reveal the magnetic field in cold dark clouds? The Astrophysical Journal. ,vol. 448, pp. 748- 765 ,(1995) , 10.1086/176003
Thierry Passot, Enrique Vázquez-Semadeni, Density probability distribution in one-dimensional polytropic gas dynamics Physical Review E. ,vol. 58, pp. 4501- 4510 ,(1998) , 10.1103/PHYSREVE.58.4501
Jonathan Arons, Claire Ellen Max, Hydromagnetic waves in molecular clouds The Astrophysical Journal. ,vol. 196, ,(1975) , 10.1086/181748