Cosmopolitanism, Globalization and The Field of Adolescent Literacy

作者: Helen Harper , Thomas Bean , Judith Dunkerly

DOI: 10.5206/CIE-ECI.V39I3.9159

关键词:

摘要: In this article we discuss the current nature and circumstances of cosmopolitanism what it means to field adolescent literacy. Drawing on contemporary scholarship, is understood as: 1) local experience or condition globalization, has been called ‘internal globalization,’ and, 2) as a disposition sensibility that ensures productive peaceful relations in light globalization any circumstance creates dynamic culturally diverse contexts. From critical review key documents field, argue for many adolescents their lives literacies now, especially future, will be lived out interface global. might described cosmopolitan age work done under rubric literacy, was evident carefully documenting terrain literacies, leading charge reform policy practice. However, there need reconfigure expand concepts, precepts practices have come name literacy order ensure students are well served by education. Resume Cet discute la et les circonstances du concept de cosmopolitisme ce qu’il signifie dans le domaine litteratie des adolescents. Du point vue savoir actuel, definit (1) l’experience ou locale globalisation, qui est connu sous terme « globalisation interne » (2) sensibilite assure productives pacifiques un contexte global toutes creent contextes culturellement dynamiques differents. En nous basant sur une revision critique cles, argumentons que vies litteraties actuelles futures beaucoup d’adolescents seront vecues entre monde tout aussi Nous discuterons peut representer adolescente l’ere cosmopolite. revisant cette facon critique, il facile s’apercevoir nombre croissant publications son importance reforme politiques pratiques terrain. Il cependant fait necessaire reconfigurer developper ces preceptes afin d’assurer leur adequation l’education en INTRODUCTION 1998 Allen Luke John Elkins suggested era which living unique history, unprecedented speed economic, social technological change. They argued these “New Times” changing dramatically, therefore new vision education 21 century needed (Luke & Elkins, 1998, p. 4). This vision, according must informed emerging communication technologies challenges pose

参考文章(31)
Lucy Karanja, “Homeless” at Home: Linguistic, Cultural, and Identity Hybridity and Third Space Positioning of Kenyan Urban Youth Comparative and International Education / Éducation Comparée et Internationale. ,vol. 39, pp. 1- 19 ,(2010) , 10.5206/CIE-ECI.V39I2.9151
Glynda A. Hull, Mark Evan Nelson, Literacy, Media, and Morality: Making the Case for an Aesthetic Turn The Future of Literacy Studies. pp. 199- 227 ,(2009) , 10.1057/9780230245693_11
David T. Hansen, Cosmopolitanism and Education: A View From the Ground Teachers College Record. ,vol. 112, pp. 1- 30 ,(2010)
Martha C. Nussbaum, Francis Fukuyama, For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism ,(1996)
Patrick Hayden, Cosmopolitan Global Politics ,(2005)
Jane Kenway, Michael Singh, Michael W. Apple, Globalizing Education: Policies, Pedagogies, and Politics Peter Lang Publishing. ,(2005)
Stuart N. Hart, Children's rights in education Jessica Kingsley. ,(2001)