The Effects of Privatization on R&D Investments and Patent Productivity

作者: Federico Munari , Maurizio Sobrero

DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.331721

关键词:

摘要: Over the last two decades privatization programs in different countries have radically reduced role of State as a key player economic arena. We use agency theory to discuss theoretical elationship between changes firm's principal-agent structure following privatization, incentives invest R&D and performance. compare pre- post- effort outcomes 35 companies that were fully or partially privatized European Union through public share offers 1980 1997. Our results show that, after controlling for inter-industry differences, switch private ownership leads decrease overall ontemporaneous increase quantity patents granted their quality, measured by intensity citations. Taken together, these findings support expectation increased innovation productivity divestment.

参考文章(93)
Richard S. Rosenbloom, William J. Spencer, Engines of innovation : U.S. industrial research at the end of an era Harvard Business School Press. ,(1996)
Abbie J. Smith, Corporate ownership structure and performance Journal of Financial Economics. ,vol. 27, pp. 143- 164 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0304-405X(90)90024-T
Rebecca Henderson, Iain Cockburn, Scale, Scope and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in the Pharmaceutical Industry Social Science Research Network. ,(1993) , 10.3386/W4466
William L. Megginson, Jeffry M. Netter, From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization Social Science Research Network. ,(2001) , 10.2139/SSRN.262311
Pankaj Ghemawat, CJ Roberts, Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy ,(1991)
Zoltan J. Acs, David B. Audretsch, Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis Social Science Research Network. ,(1988)
Edward B. Roberts, Benchmarking the Strategic Management of Technology—I Research-technology Management. ,vol. 38, pp. 44- 56 ,(1995) , 10.1080/08956308.1995.11671024
Porter Me, Capital disadvantage: America's failing capital investment system. Harvard Business Review. ,vol. 70, pp. 65- 82 ,(1992)