Generalization in Qualitative Research

作者: Geoff Payne , Malcolm Williams

DOI: 10.1177/0038038505050540

关键词:

摘要: Earlier treatments of moderatum generalization (e.g. Williams, 2000a) explicitly addressed interpretivist sociology. This article extends that earlier argument by examining some its implications for a wider range qualitative research methods. It first adopts an empirical approach, providing concrete illustrations from the most recent volume Sociology what sociologists actually do when describing meaning their findings. In light this, we reconsider significance practice and status sociological knowledge, in particular making case design should plan anticipated generalizations, be more formulated within context supporting evidence.

参考文章(30)
Yvonna S. Lincoln, Egon G. Guba, Joseph J. Pilotta, Naturalistic inquiry International Journal of Intercultural Relations. ,vol. 9, pp. 438- 439 ,(1985) , 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Clive Seale, The quality of qualitative research Sage Publications. ,(1999) , 10.4135/9780857020093
Judy Payne, Geoff Payne, Key Concepts in Social Research ,(2004)
David Silverman, Interpreting Qualitative Data ,(1993)
Lucy Dillon, Liz Spencer, Jane Lewis, Jane Ritchie, Quality in qualitative evaluation : a framework for assessing research evidence Cabinet Office. ,(2003)